From mk@dee.su Fri Jul 6 02:30:36 2018 From: Maxim Kammerer To: cypherpunks-legacy@lists.cpunks.org Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Transparent e-mail encryption? Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2018 02:30:36 +0000 Message-ID: <172289273489.3881296.6151435915906102596.generated@mail.pglaf.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4874874941594594738==" --===============4874874941594594738== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Matej Kovacic wro= te: > However, the problem is that for end-to-end encryption sender AND > recipient must use encryption. Unfortunately most people do not use > encryption and there are only two solutions: you do not communicate with > these people (which is not really an option) OR you communicate without > encryption. If you do not require interoperability with SMTP, cables communication [1] does what you require b=14 encryption and authentication are transparent, and server issues can be ignored, since there are no servers. Cables communication also has delivery verification and other features. Note that PGP / S/MIME-type encryption is undesirable for most users, since it ties authentication to non-repudiability [2]. [1] http://dee.su/cables [2] http://www.cypherpunks.ca/otr/otr-wpes.pdf --=20 Maxim Kammerer LibertC) Linux: http://dee.su/liberte _______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk(a)lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk ----- End forwarded message ----- --=20 Eugen* Leitl leitl http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE --===============4874874941594594738==--