From flyingkiwiguy@gmail.com Fri Jul 6 02:41:44 2018 From: Gary Mulder To: cypherpunks-legacy@lists.cpunks.org Subject: Re: [ZS] Two criticisms of ZS, and solutions... Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2018 02:41:44 +0000 Message-ID: <172289279730.3881296.13079332448706700846.generated@mail.pglaf.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7652144470187797241==" --===============7652144470187797241== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 17 December 2012 14:53, Tyler wrote: > > Also BTC is a monetary system. Basing worth on wealth might not be the > best way to form ZS. > I think a distributed Web Of trust model would work well and not be > beholden to any central authority However, a BTC address can be used as a unique, distributed, verifiable, but still semi-anonymous identity. I just read the following interesting blog post which also looks at trust and reputation online: http://associatesmind.com/2012/12/07/the-hyperlink-a-microtransaction-of-trus= t/ Regards, Gary --=20 --=20 Zero State mailing list: http://groups.google.com/group/DoctrineZero ----- End forwarded message ----- --=20 Eugen* Leitl leitl http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE --===============7652144470187797241==--