From coderman@gmail.com Fri Jul 6 02:32:04 2018 From: coderman To: cypherpunks-legacy@lists.cpunks.org Subject: Re: [cryptography] "Combined" cipher modes Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2018 02:32:04 +0000 Message-ID: <172289097259.3849117.8115483623931430729.generated@mail.pglaf.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3147626883844470988==" --===============3147626883844470988== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Wyss, Felix wrote: >... > Maybe being conservative is warranted: http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/ST/toolk= it/BCM/documents/comments/CWC-GCM/Ferguson2.pdf don't use GCM wrong? short tags are bad. changing tag lengths are bad. use 128bit tags. reminds me of CTR mode arguments... _______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list cryptography(a)randombit.net http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography ----- End forwarded message ----- --=20 Eugen* Leitl leitl http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE --===============3147626883844470988==--