From eugen@leitl.org Wed Dec 8 08:54:24 2010 From: Eugen Leitl To: cypherpunks-legacy@lists.cpunks.org Subject: Re: leaker-optimized versions of Tor Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 08:54:24 +0000 Message-ID: <20101208135137.GM9434@leitl.org> In-Reply-To: <6CDF49B0-DE86-4125-AC50-A512F000B3CE@coderpunks.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7628509292361260126==" --===============7628509292361260126== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 02:40:51PM +0100, Ralf Philipp Weinmann wrote: > The technology you're looking for is called 'remailer'. Used be be popular = in the 90s. Mixmaster is still around, though.=20 I've used to run a remailer a while ago, and, no, this are not the droids I'm looking for. =20 > Taking my tongue out of the cheek: >=20 > High-latency doesn't make sense on the TCP layer, sessions will time=20 > out before you get anything through. SMTP is a nice-enough protocol=20 DTN seems to be able to handle that. =20 > on the application layer, so why not go with it? Publishing via SMTP is a good idea, actually. Access is not critical, publishing is. --=20 Eugen* Leitl leitl http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE --===============7628509292361260126==--