On Saturday, May 11, 2019, 9:10:31 PM PDT, Steve Kinney
   <admin@pilobilus.net> wrote:

   On 5/11/19 11:57 PM, Steve Kinney wrote:
   >> If this took place before The Intercept burned Reality Winner, shame
   on
   >> The Intercept.  If it took place after, shame on the leaker.
   >Postscript:  The Reality Winner incident did come /after/ the
   >publication of docs apparently submitted to The Intercept by Daniel
   >Hale.  So, he had no obvious way to know where NOT to send TS dox.
   Years ago, I recall reading that early on in the history of inkjet
   printers, even 1990, 'features' were built in the printers to detect if
   the printed document "looked like" a US dollar, small yellow dots,
   precisely placed to encode source data, were written over the face of
   the document.
   It seemed to me that removing the yellow cartridge, plus a thorough
   exhausting of the residual material, would improve the security.
   Based on what I heard, it wasn't clear that such security dots, or
   other features, were used for non-currency-counterfeiting
   applications.   It sounds from these recent incidents as if inkjet
   printers are putting identifiable information on virtually any
   printouts.
                       Jim Bell