On Saturday, December 22, 2018, 12:35:59 AM PST, Zenaan Harkness
   <zen@freedbms.net> wrote:

   >Snowflakes rejoice and SCOTUS here we come after this Appeals Court
   ruling that University of Mary Washington has failed to censor
   "possibly students at the university, but no one is sure" from using
   Yik Yak, some location-based pseudonymity app.
   >Hey, what good's a court (((they))) can't game?
   [ For 'intolerant Marxist' values of "they". ]
   >Appeals Court Rules Colleges Must Censor, Block Online Services If
   They Offend Someone
   [1]https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-12-20/appeals-court-rules-colleg
   es-must-censor-block-online-services-if-they-offend
   >… Here’s some background:
   >A location-based social media app called Yik Yak used to exist. It
   let users post things anonymously in a given geographic area, such
   as around colleges.
   >Unsurprisingly, a lot of people posted boorish and offensive things.
   Even less surprisingly, people with fascist tendencies demanded
   their universities identify and punish those people.
   Naturally, the "people with fascist tendencies" probably called
   themselves "anti-fascists".
   A comment I read recently:   'Fascists' are classified into two
   groups:  'Fascists' and 'Anti-Fascists'.

References

   1. https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-12-20/appeals-court-rules-colleges-must-censor-block-online-services-if-they-offend