I can see y all have hiclass jobz that give uz layber day off. ur
   kollige stewdints getting one lastdrunk in.

   -------- Original message --------
   From: Greg Newby <gbnewby@pglaf.org>
   Date: 9/5/18 8:11 PM (GMT-08:00)
   To: cypherpunks@lists.cpunks.org
   Subject: Re: cpunks archives gone as at September?

   On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 12:28:23PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
   > On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 07:15:07PM -0700, Mirimir wrote:
   > > On 09/05/2018 06:46 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
   > > > On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 06:24:29PM -0700, Mirimir wrote:
   > > >> On 09/05/2018 05:19 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
   > > >>> Are the cpunks archives (or the list I guess) gone for good?
   > > >>
   > > >> https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/
   > > >>
   > > >> | September 2018 Archives by date
   > > >> |
   > > >> |     Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
   > > >> |     More info on this list...
   > > >> |
   > > >> | Starting: Wed Sep 5 17:19:36 PDT 2018
   > > >> | Ending: Wed Sep 5 18:03:28 PDT 2018
   > > >> | Messages: 2
   > > >> |
   > > >> |     cpunks archives gone as at September?   Zenaan Harkness
   > > >> |     cpunks archives gone as at September?   jim bell
   > > >> |
   > > >> | Last message date: Wed Sep 5 18:03:28 PDT 2018
   > > >> | Archived on: Wed Sep 5 18:03:35 PDT 2018
   > > >> |
   > > >> |     Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
   > > >> |     More info on this list...
   > > >>
   > > >> There's something ironic about that ;)
   > > >
   > > > Looks like those folk who "group" reply, but are not subscribed,
   are
   > > > not getting bounces to inform them they need to be subscribed?
   (or
   > > > may be they are - idk)
   > > >
   > > > I've had at least two such replies in September and there were no
   > > > archives until today, so their emails must get to me, but be
   dropped
   > > > due to not being subscribed, and therefore not archived.
   > > >
   > > > Makes sense.
   > >
   > > You've confused me.
   > >
   > > Are you saying that https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/
   was
   > > gone for a while recently?
   > >
   > > Or are you saying that you've received messages from the list that
   don't
   > > show up in the archives?
   >
   > I received messages which I thought were from the list and did not
   > show up in the archives.
   >
   > There were no -actual- messages for September until today, and so the
   > archive for Sept did not exist.
   This seems correct.
   > My sieve filter checks for To and Cc, and for the list-id, and files
   > all such emails into my cp folder, and there were at least 2 such
   > emails in September prior to today, which are not in the cpunks
   > archives.
   Evidently these messages went to you and was handled correctly, but
   were never posted to the cypherpunks@lists.cpunks.org list.
   If anyone thinks messages *were* posted but *were not* archived at the
   link above, please let me know and I can dig into some log files.
   > It seems that some folks group-reply, and ignore any bounce or not
   > subscribed messages (since I receive such emails semi regularly, I
   > assumed that such persons would subscribe or stop group-replying and
   > just privately reply...)
   Yes.  Mailman rejects a few things silently, but mostly people should
   get a bounce if a message is not accepted for the list.  If anyone
   spots anomalies, let me know and I can take a closer look at the list
   config.
   I believe it's safe to "Cc: cypherpunks@lists.cpunks.org" but not "Bcc:
   cypherpunks@lists.cpunks.org"
   Also Mailman has a threshold for how many addresses may be included in
   To: and Cc: before flagging for the moderator (me).  This hasn't
   happened recently.
   I noticed this whole series of messages seems to be archived correctly,
   which indicates that at least some things are currently working
   correctly.
     - Greg (cpunks list maintainer)