On Dec 23, 2017, at 12:06 PM, juan <[1]juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:

   On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 22:26:24 -0500
   grarpamp <[2]grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:

     [3]http://beyondthemarquee.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/902274_101
     53332384195401_182169004_o.jpg

     [4]https://img00.deviantart.net/580e/i/2012/043/5/a/giant_hammer___d
     row_by_zephyr_aryn-d4pkhrv.png

     [5]https://i.pinimg.com/236x/f8/83/87/f883877b2cc9804048c3ef982500e8
     6e--harly-quinn-halloween-stuff.jpg

     Found some holiday gifts for my friend Juan ;)

      and speaking of thor and odin...
      [6]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christmas
      "Christmas is an annual festival commemorating the birth of
      Jesus Christ,"  - except that the fucking jesus turd was never
      born.
      "Although the month and date of Jesus' birth are unknow..."
      but that motherfuking joo turd was never born so there's
      nothing to be known.
      Now the very interesting thing is that the source of All
      Scientfic Progressive Wisodm known as "WIKIPEDIA" is actually a
      tool of fascist theocratic joo-kristian propaganda.

   I agree, Wikipedia is badly skewed on this, but it seems like they are

   probably just following conventional thought on the issue. Which I feel

   is coming around to be more widely accepted that there was no Jesus

   as described in the gospels that started the early Christian church
   (though

   it was a common Jewish name - Yeshua - at that time in history, and

   there are a few other Yeshuas with messianic delusions described in

   the talmud from around the same time).

   They do have a “historicity of jesus” page, which at least has the
   following

   info -

   [7]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus

   More recently [8]Richard Carrier argues in his book On the Historicity
   of Jesus: Why We Might Have Reason for Doubt, that there is
   insufficient [9]Bayesian probability, that is evidence, to believe in
   the existence of Jesus. Furthermore, he argues that the Jesus figure
   was probably originally known only through private revelations and
   hidden messages in scripture which were then crafted into a historical
   figure, to communicate the claims of the gospels allegorically. These
   allegories then started to be believed as fact during the struggle for
   control of the Christian churches of the 1st
   century.^[10][106] [11]Philip R. Davies has opined that a recognition
   that the historicity of Jesus is not entirely certain would nudge Jesus
   scholarship towards academic respectability^[12][103] and [13]R. Joseph
   Hoffmann at the [14]Jesus Project noted that Jesus is getting more
   vague, ambiguous, and uncertain the more scholars study him, rather
   than the other way around.^[15][116

References

   1. mailto:juan.g71@gmail.com
   2. mailto:grarpamp@gmail.com
   3. http://beyondthemarquee.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/902274_10153332384195401_182169004_o.jpg
   4. https://img00.deviantart.net/580e/i/2012/043/5/a/giant_hammer___drow_by_zephyr_aryn-d4pkhrv.png
   5. https://i.pinimg.com/236x/f8/83/87/f883877b2cc9804048c3ef982500e86e--harly-quinn-halloween-stuff.jpg
   6. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christmas
   7. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus
   8. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Carrier
   9. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayesian_probability
  10. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus#cite_note-OTHOJ-115
  11. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_R._Davies
  12. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus#cite_note-bibleinterp.com-112
  13. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/R._Joseph_Hoffmann
  14. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_Project
  15. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus#cite_note-125