On Wednesday, September 13, 2017, 12:04:45 PM PDT, Marina Brown
   <catskillmarina@gmail.com> wrote:
   >> Sorry, but you are not even hundreds of miles away from being
   correct on
   >> this.  To label DNS service, which is essentially monopoly, as
   >> supporting "genocide" is about 3-4 leaps of logic, far too much to
   work.
   >> A few nuts spouting nonsense is far, very far, from "conspiracy to
   >> commit genocide".  Merely providing necessary net services to them,
   just
   >> as is done for thousands of sites, cannot possibly be described that
   >> way.   Maybe you just have no respect for the concept of "Free
   Speech".
   >>              Jim Bell
   >I am concerned about the market monopoly of DNS service ...but
   >This is not about speech. It is about people conspiring to commit
   genocide, ethnic cleansing and to remove peoples human rights.
   Sorry, but I cannot agree.  That's way too close to the 'nutty lefty'
   way of thinking that is infecting our society today.    At most, it is
   "hate speech", which the First Amendment protects.
   >You cannot simultaneously enguage in free speech and a conspiracy to
   commit genocide. One is permitted, one is a crime.
   What do you mean, "you cannot"?   Do you mean, 'you are not allowed
   to'?  Or do you mean, 'you are not capable of...'.  ?
   Further, your reference to "conspiracy to commit genocide" is merely a
   flawed characterization on your part.  While I don't claim that
   absolutely no people on the right are "conspiring to commit genocide",
   the vast majority are merely engaging in hostile speech that the left
   doesn't like, speech that I consider they have a right to make.   I
   don't consider that as any justification at all to begin trying to shut
   down their right to free speech.
   Actual genocide is a major problem   But your mere characterization of
   free speech as being "conspiracy to commit genocide" appears to me to
   not merely be wrong, but foolish.
   >"...Unless you want to redefine free speech to include criminal
   conspiracy."
   Unless you can actually show a specific criminal conspiracy, I'm not
   interested in your histrionics.
   >"We can oppose monopolies like DNS TLD without defending conspiracy to
   commit genocide."
   We can defend people's right to free speech without being accused of
   defending conspiracy to commit genocide.
   Oh, wait,  I forgot.  That's SO 20th Century!!!
                   Jim Bell