Due to inflation my opinion has increased in value from two to three
   cents.
   [1]https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/08/fighting-neo-nazis-future-free
   -expression
   This talk about free speech runs contrary to libertarian values about
   not having borders. Offending people is not protected by the
   non-aggression principle, and so the risk of people entering a space to
   experience undesired speech is too great a risk. As the number of
   rights expand, so must the number of freedoms decrease.
   It is too far to call the Daily Stormer vitriolic and abusive, it is
   clearly only in bad taste and puerile. For some reason after the Reagan
   administration, everyone became more puritan, and no one can even
   directly discuss any subject matter so I will say it: Calling anyone
   who died a fat slut is far outside civilized speech, and is certainly
   not something to be joked about in public.
   Yes, what GoDaddy, Google, and Cloudflare did was dangerous. So did
   what Obama did
   ( [2]https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/02/documents-about-financial-ce
   nsorship-under-operation-choke-point-concern-congress ). Yes, it is
   terrible that states and malicious actors censors others through DDOS
   attacks, why are DDOS attacks ignored as speech? Those state owned
   computers should be blocked from the internet.
   I too agree with net neutrality and think "internet intermediaries"
   shouldn't make much content based decisions, outside of that needed to
   maintain service.

References

   1. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/08/fighting-neo-nazis-future-free-expression
   2. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/02/documents-about-financial-censorship-under-operation-choke-point-concern-congress