The hypothesis being that Snowden is at least a triple agent. Ali
   Mohammed provided material support to Al Qaeda, but that was because he
   betrayed both the Army and Al Qaeda for the CIA. His sentencing has
   been on hold for a long time, and it is interesting no one asks
   questions about it.
   If one was to look for information about my hypothesis, what would one
   find?
   [1]https://wikileaks.org/ciav7p1/
   The implants are configured to communicate via HTTPS with the webserver
   of a cover domain; each operation utilizing these implants has a
   separate cover domain and the infrastructure can handle any number of
   cover domains.
   Each cover domain resolves to an IP address that is located at a
   commercial VPS (Virtual Private Server) provider. The public-facing
   server forwards all incoming traffic via a VPN to a 'Blot' server that
   handles actual connection requests from clients. It is setup for
   optional SSL client authentication: if a client sends a valid client
   certificate (only implants can do that), the connection is forwarded to
   the 'Honeycomb' toolserver that communicates with the implant; if a
   valid certificate is missing (which is the case if someone tries to
   open the cover domain website by accident), the traffic is forwarded to
   a cover server that delivers an unsuspicious looking website.
   ---
   Snowden's revelations increased the amount of encryption. However the
   NSA already collects a great amount of information through other means.
   For reasons unknown, much of the Snowden documents are classified at
   Talent Keyhole, which is explained at
   ( [2]http://electrospaces.blogspot.com/2013/09/the-us-classification-sy
   stem.html ). Although overclassification is typical, afterall, many of
   the "secret" paragraphs are really FOUO because they are used in the
   private sector already
   ( [3]https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3546567-10th-Anniversary-E
   dition-EP-3-Damage-Assessment.html#document/p33 ), the thing is that
   this implies the NSA collects data through means unhindered by
   encryption. Which makes "Practical-Titled Attack on AES-128 Using
   Chosen-Text Relations" all the more concerning. Why mock side channel
   cryptanalysis?
   Furthermore, Github has made accidentally publishing your shared secret
   very
   easy. [4]https://github.com/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=remove+password&typ
   e=Commits&ref=searchresults
   Many cases where AWS refunds thousands of dollars of fraud because
   someone accidentally publishes a Github key. To think that could be
   millions of dollars a week. Just refunding fraud. Naturally official
   CIA documentation would not suggest committing a crime, that would be
   like putting login settings to the production database into the
   tutorial
   ( [5]https://np.reddit.com/r/cscareerquestions/comments/6ez8ag/accident
   ally_destroyed_production_database_on/ ).
   Interestingly, insecure defaults imperil national
   security: [6]https://theintercept.com/2017/05/11/nyu-accidentally-expos
   ed-military-code-breaking-computer-project-to-entire-internet/ .
   Regardless, you can still troll the NSA. They couldn't even design the
   Clipper chip correctly.
   Anyway, this modified limited hangout phrase is some really high level
   linguistics. Really complex, seems to intentionally prevent the reader
   from seeing patterns.

References

   1. https://wikileaks.org/ciav7p1/
   2. http://electrospaces.blogspot.com/2013/09/the-us-classification-system.html
   3. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3546567-10th-Anniversary-Edition-EP-3-Damage-Assessment.html#document/p33
   4. https://github.com/search?utf8=✓&q=remove+password&type=Commits&ref=searchresults
   5. https://np.reddit.com/r/cscareerquestions/comments/6ez8ag/accidentally_destroyed_production_database_on/
   6. https://theintercept.com/2017/05/11/nyu-accidentally-exposed-military-code-breaking-computer-project-to-entire-internet/