[1]https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Wikispooks:Anonymous_Submissions
   As of January 2017, WikiSpooks has withdrawn provision of an Anonymous
   file upload upload facility.
   Anonymous submissions are still welcome but, in view of low historical
   usage of the secure upload-form facility, pgp-encrypted email (with or
   without file attachments) is the only practical method available for
   the site. Use of pgp-encryption with a single-use email address over a
   public WiFi facility is probably as 'anonymous' as was the discontinued
   form.
   Note: Unless anonymity is of fundamental importance, the best way to
   publish a document file on Wikispooks is through the 'Regular file
   upload' page, available to all registered users. Files uploaded using
   this option are immediately available to both view and edit on the
   WikiSpooks site.
   [2]https://twitter.com/ericgeller/status/871842516458496001
   Obviously if a news outlet is to publish a document, it should minimize
   any information conveyed beyond the message. Actually US Gov FOI
   practices typically involve printing out a redacted document before
   re-scanning it. Ideally the best thing for the Intercept to have done
   is to use a low resolution black-white copy machine, and mail the
   document again since there is no urgency in this matter.
   Naturally I am interested in when news organizations will publish
   unredacted documents. After five years, information loses a lot of
   value. Lot of software end of lifed five years ago, which doesn't
   include Windows XP, which was EOL'd more recently than five years ago.
   Regardless, I think journalists should be more carefully vetted, maybe
   some of them met the Russian ambassador.
   ......
   [3]https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/19174#efmAMfANh

References

   1. https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Wikispooks:Anonymous_Submissions
   2. https://twitter.com/ericgeller/status/871842516458496001
   3. https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/19174#efmAMfANh