What I meant,  if you are holding and sharing an entire file of some
   really sensitive content and depend on networking technologies known or
   assumed to have flaws which can expose your IP address you have
   relinquished ability to deny it.
   Whereas is this content has been published, using something like
   Freenet, so no single user of the content distribution system has more
   than a fragment of that content and what they each have is not only
   encrypted (and you don't have the key) but its bit interleaved and your
   software has no idea what part(s) of the content you hold nor where
   those other parts reside (for that your software must possess the
   file's "treasure map" which can be closely held). This offers good
   plausible deniability.
   Warrant Canary creator
   On May 21, 2017 2:24 PM, "grarpamp" <[1]grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:

   > Mojo was being developed contemporanously with Freenet and shares
   some of
   > its distributed features. It was sort of like Freenet + a resource
   based
   > currency.

     True.

   > You do not want a filesharing system as it removes any hope of
   > plausible deniability for content.

     Huh?
     If it's encrypted and anonymous it's deniable by all, and even
     billed
     for "filesharing" is fine, at least currently, due to legal free
     speech
     uses riding within. Though if you bill it for "illegal copyright
     infringement',
     you yourself might take heat for "incitement", but the network
     itself would
     still be safe. Such network nodes themselves, like I2P / Tor /
     Freenet,
     operate freely because of that principle, and it's been proven out
     successfully so far for maybe 15-20 years. Strongly encrypted +
     strongly
     anonymous + decentralized works in this space. Unfortunately, few
     qualify...
     Napster, gnutella, limewire, kazaa, bittorrent, whatever... when run
     over
     clearnet... of course they all get shutdown. Due to some combination
     of centralized, not encrypted, not anonymous.... no deniability
     there.
     Wikipedia is a bit scattered, but here's some references.......
     [2]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymous_P2P

References

   1. mailto:grarpamp@gmail.com
   2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymous_P2P