From: Razer <g2s@riseup.net>
   On 02/12/2017 05:16 PM, jim bell wrote:

   From: Razer [1]<g2s@riseup.net>
   >>>Accounts created specifically to harass. But they aren't saying how:
   >>> [2]https://blog.twitter.com/2017/an-update-on-safety
   >>>                       ...and no one writing it up seems to know
   either
   >>What I want to know, is:  What is their definition of the word,
   "harass"?
   >>Contradict?  Disprove?  Argue against?  Make unhappy?
   >>Is Twitter going to adopt a consistent policy that political
   statements aren't allowed?
   >> Jim Bell

   >Ask @Support or @jack. Maybe they can tell you.
   >I would guess it's what their policy always was. If you think their
   policy is 'inconsistent' that's because it depends on who gets
   harassment complaints against them that are verifiable.
   But I'm still waiting for a  definition of "harassment".  Do you have
   your own?
                  Jim Bell

References

   1. mailto:g2s@riseup.net
   2. https://blog.twitter.com/2017/an-update-on-safety