No, you made comments on my posting, but you ignored certain parts,
   including my question about how you distinguish between "fascists" and
   "conservatives".   Says a lot.  You are aware that you still haven't
   explained how you distinguish that.
                   Jim Bell
     __________________________________________________________________

   From: Razer <g2s@riseup.net>
   To: "cypherpunks@lists.cpunks.org" <cypherpunks@lists.cpunks.org>
   Sent: Friday, February 3, 2017 9:26 AM
   Subject: Re: How to act in self defense - concealed carry saves the day
   I answered the question, and won't reiterate.
   On 02/02/2017 11:37 PM, jim bell wrote:

   From: James A. Donald [1]<jamesd@echeque.com>
   On 2/3/2017 2:14 AM, Razer wrote:
   >> Right. Nazis have no right to be espousing the extermination of
   people
   >> because of ethnic or other fate-of-birth traits alone.
   >But none of the people you are calling nazis and beating up have
   espoused the extermination of ethnic groups.
   >Rather you equate disagreeing with the left on any of enormous number
   of
   points with nazism.  There is hardly anyone on the Republican side of
   politics, and not many on the Democrat side, that are progressive
   enough
   to be not be nazis.
   Excellent point:
   On 2/01/2017, at 11:20, I asked, and then answered my own question,
   since Razer didn't provide any answer:
   I asked:

   >>So, is there any reliable way to distinguish a mere "conservative"
   from a "fascist"?
   [no response by Razer, so I said,]
   I wish you'd have been able to answer this question.
   [end]

   To Razer and his ilk, a  "Nazi", or "fascist",  is simply a person
   more-rightward than [fill in the blank], where that "fill in the blank"
   is probably a leftist.
              Jim Bell

References

   1. mailto:jamesd@echeque.com