On 01/11/2017 07:52 PM, Mirimir wrote:

On 01/11/2017 08:08 AM, Razer wrote:


On 01/10/2017 09:58 PM, [some random racist] wrote:

I, and Darwin, have studied human evolution extensively and deeply.

Charles Darwin would spit o you for cherry-picking what he wrote.

Yes, there's that.

But also, he was also probably a racist. Given the cultural context, I
mean. And in any case, he truly did know next to nothing about human
evolution. Nobody did, then. So he was just bullshitting. Maybe trying
to ingratiate himself to the religiously racist establishment.

Anyway, quoting him selectively about human evolution makes about as
much sense as quoting him about plate tectonics. He was a geologist,
after all. Or quoting Ludwig Boltzmann about design of gas turbines.


   Darwin is so taken out of context and disabused. For instance he DID
   define who 'the fittest' were. Not the strongest or most ruthless.
   Those who cooperate the best. admittedly that's a psychopathic
   strong-point. Even if they don't have the same goals they're masters of
   the 'temporary alliance' (the "B" of the ABCs of psychopathy, no
   "Bonds"). He also used the word "Love" a lot. Something that
   psychopaths don't do so well.
   Rr
   Ps. I think this is whatsisname who was posting long diatribes a while
   back Can't place the handle.