On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:10 PM, juan <[1]juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote: On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 22:00:01 -0200 Cecilia Tanaka <[2]cecilia.tanaka@gmail.com> wrote: > > ​I did not send any picture, Juan. I was just answering to the > person who sent the pic.​ I profusely apologize. The person who sent the pic is no other than rayzer then... It seems that somehow the picture got attached to your message, plus(or again my client is playing up). Also, I can't find your message dated " Wed, 4 Jan 2017 02:38:48 -0200" in the archive. I'm pretty sure it's not here : [3]https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2017- January/date.html There's this message from you dated Jan 3 [4]https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2017- January/034745.html and then this one Jan 6 [5]https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2017- January/034783.html but nothing for Jan 4. Weird. ​I will forward​ ​it for you, then. Hey, instead trying to kick my poor butt, don't want to help me with a future law, which will (try to) regulate the IoT in Brazil? :) I am almost dying with a pretty annoying pain, but these are the last days of the public consulting about this theme and it's great to have an opportunity to avoid more legislative disasters, brrr... I need to tell you some news too. We are trying to "hack" some institutions, which regulate the Brazilian Internet. Political hacking, Juan. Much better than kicking me is kicking other lawyers, less 'cute-cute' and colorful than me, haha! ;) References 1. mailto:juan.g71@gmail.com 2. mailto:cecilia.tanaka@gmail.com 3. https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2017-January/date.html 4. https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2017-January/034745.html 5. https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2017-January/034783.html