Ya john - stop feeding trolls -------- Original Message -------- On Nov 29, 2016, 10:48 AM, Mirimir wrote: On 11/29/2016 10:26 AM, John Newman wrote: > BLAH BLAH BLAH > > TL Did not fucking read Yes, he is totally full of shit. I wish that people wouldn't reply to him. Then I wouldn't even know that it was there ;) > -- > John > >> On Nov 29, 2016, at 9:09 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 08:21:31AM -0500, John Newman wrote: >>> On Nov 29, 2016, at 6:04 AM, xorcist at sigaint.org wrote: >>>>> John Newman: >>>>> read the links you sent? >>>> >>>> They ar as Zordon suggested >>>> >>>> "Zwally’s team calculated that the mass gain from the thickening of East >>>> Antarctica remained steady from 1992 to 2008 at 200 billion tons per year, >>>> while the ice losses from the coastal regions of West Antarctica and the >>>> Antarctic Peninsula increased by 65 billion tons per year" >>>> >>>> "They also used information on snow accumulation for tens of thousands of >>>> years, derived by other scientists from ice cores, to conclude that East >>>> Antarctica has been thickening for a very long time" >>> >>> And the thickening, in this one area, which as you say has been >>> happening for "a very long time", is slowing down. And nowhere in the >>> article is any of the anthropic climate change phenomena claimed to be >>> false. >>> >>> Framing this story in the context of debunking climate change is, as I >>> said, bullshit. >> >> John John John, your subtlety befalls you. Notice the original subject: >> "Rising carbon dioxide is greening the Earth - but it's not all good >> news" >> >> Notice my slanted posts, and my default position in the face of >> underwhelming "science" (basically, computer models). >> >> Notice also this little tool called email, and replies. Replies is the >> bit where substantive responses are brought forth - I know you seem a >> little conceptually challenged here and there, so I guess we need to >> make compensatory consideration for your limitations. >> >> >>>>> full of shit >> >> John, this is another aspect of email, and (more generally you >> understand), communication in really any media -> non substantive >> responses can also be made. >> >> This might be another revelation for you - we can prolly pool a crowd >> funded LED light for you if that would help, with a black marker pen to >> draw an idea highlight circle around the LED light on your forehead. I'd >> probably draw it somewhat like "666". >> >> >> Now I'd look at that short temper that is unfrotulantly being displayed >> in this thread, consider how much counselling and safe spaces may >> assist, and when the healing happens, get back to winning - you know, >> like substantive responses, science and the rest... you'll feel better >> that way, trust me, I feel you pain, I hope for your soul, I pray for >> your salvation - it's the best I can do really :/ >> >> >> My only caveat right now is I'm not sure if that'd be consensual praying >> for said salvation. I'm a firm believer in user prays, you see. Imposing >> my Marxist brain fart on your eternal future may not be in your best >> interest. >> >> >> Best of luck John, come again, and if you do please try to bring a >> substantive response - railing against seekers because their >> seeking doesn't quite match your personal "full of shit" response >> program is unlikely to raise the dailog, >> Zenaan >> Executive Director of Vice, Ministry of Winning >> >> >> -- >> Certified (R) Deplorable (TM) Fake News (TM) Which Hunter (C) >> Executive Director.Vice, Ministry of Winning >> Shilling for buxom Russian swastika clad minxes (C) 1988 > >