From: Razer <rayzer@riseup.net>
   On 10/04/2016 08:07 PM, juan wrote:
   >>     ...but I don't think the mafia known as 'american government'
   >>     would agree with that. Subjects, hostages or 'citizens' of the
   >>     american government are, well, subjected to that mafia. The
   >>     subjection has little to do with which point in space the
   > >    subjects might be accidentaly occupying.
   >I was going to bring up the concept that corporate officers (at least)
   >are really OWNED by the corporation that employs them and the US
   >government probably considers them as 'being in the US' no matter
   where
   >they go as long as they're in the employ of a corporation chartered in
   >the US.
   That's an interesting take on the matter, but I don't think you could
   find sufficient legal precedent to force this issue against the will of
   the (vacationing?) employee, or the will of  the stay-at-home
   corporation.  Remember, I'm not even talking about an employee who
   wants to leak the information against the will of the corporation:  I'm
   speculating that the corporation WANTS some employee to leak it, but to
   do so using a means not obviously in violation of the requirements of
   the subpoena/court order.   Since a corporation generally is entitled
   to communicate information to its employees (who may not be in the
   U.S., or ever were in the U.S.), that's a powerful tool to launch the
   relevant information beyond the jurisdiction of the court.
                 Jim Bell