On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 3:14 AM, Karl Semich <[1]gmkarl@gmail.com>
   wrote:

     I would like to index such places, and create motion towards such
     security being accessible for all people.

   Attempting to compile such a list would be laborious and
   self-defeating.  It would invite compromise of the enumerated "secure"
   locations.
   It would be more useful to compile characteristics of "secure public
   spaces", and heuristics for locating them in one's local environs.  How
   can we tell - without special equipment etc - if a given space is
   monitored?  If we land in an unfamiliar city, how can we correctly
   "guess" where to find a secure public space?
   On a recent trip I discovered a little 3' x 4' nook in the outside wall
   of LA's Bonaventure Hotel.  Tho adjacent to areas of high pedestrian
   traffic, the nook was unspied by any cameras.  No microphones or other
   sensors were visible nearby.  A blissful respite from the otherwise
   panoptic surveillance of urban California.
   In this case we might speculatively take the hotel's Brutalist
   architecture as the heuristic for finding similar spaces.  Although
   sometimes described as an aesthetically "fascist" style, Brutalist
   architects loved to create little difficult-to-surveil nooks & crannies
   in their buildings.  Alas many of these spaces have been fenced up by
   the buildings' current Centrist owners.  For example
   the [2]contemptible disfigurement of Boston's magnificent Government
   Service Center building.
   What are other heuristics for finding secure less-surveilled spaces?

References

   1. mailto:gmkarl@gmail.com
   2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_Service_Center_(Boston)#/media/File:Government_Service_Center_Boston_P1000474.JPG