On Jun 23, 2016 3:42 PM, "juan" <[1]juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:

   >         Cecilia said 'moderation' (that is censorship) was almost
   always bad, but sometimes 'justified'(or something like that).
   >
   >         Given the 'context' and as far as I'm concerned, Cecilia was
   saying that banning all the people that tor-fascists banned was
   'justified' 'ok' or whatever.

   Hey, I did not say it at all, hard headed Juan!  :P

   But it is their list and their rules, being unjust or not.  If they
   want to censor their list in a dishonest and stupid way, using bad
   excuses, they will lose credibility, respect and collaborators.  Their
   problems, not mine.

   >         By the way, Cecilia's 'argument'  is pretty much
   self-defeating. If censorship is OK 'sometimes', then she can't
   complain about being censored 'sometimes', like 'this' time.

   Sorry, I wanted to read the list and don't care about following rules
   to do it, if necessary.  Social rules, for example:  - In the Summer, I
   really prefer to be nude all the time, but I use clothes or I will be
   arrested.  :-/

   Reading the tor-talk list is not possible because my personal positions
   are different?  Ok, what could I wait of a guy who can't simply admiss
   that was stupid, limited and cruel for calling a raped woman, a
   "ludicrous rape apologetics".

   I know it is a terrible bad karma, but I would love to graffitti these
   exact words in his house.  So Boyce would be able to understand how
   heavy and offensive were his words.

References

   1. mailto:juan.g71@gmail.com