Point is the technology is neutral/agnostic to its location and
   operator - and that a key part of the solution is in fact political.


   Hell, I'm still wondering who would use such a system in the first
   place without the imposition of regulation?


   On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 3:31:49 AM PST juan wrote:

   > On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 22:15:36 -0800

   >

   > Alex Stahl <alex@testcore.net> wrote:

   > > Second, he implied that, with the use of these policies, if a
   message

   > > were to traverse a network with nodes operated by the US, Canada,

   > > Egypt, India, Pakistan, Iran, Russia, China and Japan,

   >

   > I think the actual network would be more like washington,

   > boston, new york, los angeles, london, panama, puerto rico,

   > marshal islands and maybe brussels.