From: coderman <coderman@gmail.com>
   To: jim bell <jdb10987@yahoo.com>
   Cc: Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com>; cpunks <cypherpunks@cpunks.org>
   On 10/31/15, jim bell <[1]jdb10987@yahoo.com> wrote:
   > ...
   >>    I also solved David Friedman's "Hard problem", see his book, "The
   >> Machinery of Freedom",  the previously-assumed difficulty or
   impossibility
   >> of providing for the defense of a fully libertarian or anarchistic
   society.
   >i'd support AP with a basic income in place. otherwise, the few
   >outliers could out leverage even the most widely prevalent crowd
   >dispositions...
   >basic income + assassination politics == awesome future!**
   [ **this conjecture remains to be proven... ]
   This sounds like a contradiction in terms.  "basic income" implies that
   somebody
    is forced to provide somebody else an income.  Someone using force is
   anathema
   to AP:   Anyone feeling such force can use AP to act against those
   doing that
   forcing.  Forcing stops.  "Basic income" stops.
           Jim Bell

References

   1. mailto:jdb10987@yahoo.com