2015-10-29 18:43 GMT+01:00 Razer <[1]Rayzer@riseup.net>:

     On 10/29/2015 10:09 AM, Lodewijk andré de la porte wrote:
     >
     > It definitely is. A selective enumeration (which it will always
     be) is
     > merely a political tool.
     Your method is selective, and as I've stated elsewhere seems to
     revolve
     around your 'needs', most of which have been impressed in you by
     external forces with motives NOT friendly to your, or your specie's
     continued survival.

   I'm not sure what the point is. Could you clarify?
   My method is selective. Money models reality. I'm just trying to make
   it model better. Model complexity has a cost too, but generally more
   accurate is better.

     > A comprehensive enumeration is impossible to assure and costly to
     > produce. And who should bear the costs of such an enumeration?
     Society
     > as a whole?
     Absolutely.

   I think society as a whole should, where appropriate, set up a
   mechanism as I described above. What's the TrueCost of a building being
   painted white instead of black? Does white distract, manipulate,
   affect? Does black? What about indoor lights turning bluer after lunch?
   (companies actually do the latter for improving employee performance)
   If you see value in finding out, go for it. But please don't try to
   charge me for it. That's just wrong.

References

   1. mailto:Rayzer@riseup.net