1. If JYA had been willing to quietly verify that information in the
   first place, I wouldn't've had to publish it. Instead, he lied and said
   I faked the data.
   2. I only brought it up because it was relevant to the GCHQ slide,
   which John refused to comment on except to tell me in an email to keep
   going.
   3. As John has said, 'What if we harm somebody' or all this kind of
   crap. Which is strictly cowardice." When he didn't cooperate and then
   told me to keep going, I took that as his blessing.
   4. The majority of those extra posts about Cryptome or using the word
   Cryptome didn't come from me, they came from people throwing
   accusations at me and deflecting from the real point which was the
   fxcking GCHQ slide. Because heaven forbid we talk about actual
   cypherpunk issues instead of accusing someone who doesn't worship
   Snowden or JYA enough.
   5. Do you extend this same "unintended consequences" for Snowden's
   leaks when it comes to legitimate security issues, creating rifts
   between governments, creating discord among the population, accusing
   encryption of being the reason aliens haven't made contact, making it
   easier for FIS or terrorist groups to evade surveillance that has the
   potential to stop attacks against the critical infrastructure that John
   likes to take pictures of and post?
   I'm getting fed up with what feels like endless hypocrisy and personal
   attacks over a situation that I didn't play the dominant role in
   creating - JYA did. But I guess it's more fun to rabblerouse about shit
   and make accusations

     Your trolling the list with the basically useless information that
     JYA
     sold logs THAT HIS SITE OPERATION MAY NOT HAVE GENERATED (they may
     be
     netsol's right?) created a spike in the use of the word "Cryptome"
     etc
     on the radar of hackers and spammers, so yeah, you're responsible
     Mike. I can almost guarantee it wouldn't have happened without you.
     RR