I'd rather have what you call 'lazy' over nothing.
   The ideal is all distribution modes available: "Keep the info off the
   dark web, off the deep web and in the search indexes."
   Cryptome shows up on google searches. Your onion does not.
   -Travis

   On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Mirimir <[1]mirimir@riseup.net> wrote:

     On 10/11/2015 06:20 PM, Travis Biehn wrote:
     > A billboard doesn't need much 'security.' *shrug*
     Well, there are the access logs ;)
     It ought to be an onion service, no? No sure bet, of course, but
     better
     than nothing. In my opinion.
     Putting it all on users is awfully lazy, I think.

   > Travis
   >
   > On Sun, Oct 11, 2015, 8:18 PM John Young <[2]jya@pipeline.com> wrote:
   >
   >>
   >>> I would not have expected Cryptome to be on shared hosting ;) But
   yes,
   >>> that would explain it.
   >>
   >> Shared is cheap, so are we. Shared is vuln, so are we. So are the
   others
   >> despite credentials and billion-dollar armaments and above all else
   >> secrecy and shallow oversight. That explains it.
   >>
   >>
   >>
   >>
   >

   --
   [3]Twitter | [4]LinkedIn | [5]GitHub | [6]TravisBiehn.com | [7]Google
   Plus

References

   1. mailto:mirimir@riseup.net
   2. mailto:jya@pipeline.com
   3. https://twitter.com/tbiehn
   4. http://www.linkedin.com/in/travisbiehn
   5. http://github.com/tbiehn
   6. http://www.travisbiehn.com/
   7. https://plus.google.com/+TravisBiehn