Again, my first post asked for help and no one seemed interested. Yes,
   I mentioned John by name but didn't exclude anyone. I mad general open
   pleas, too. Sorry I didn't get your specific approval as one of my
   steps first, or explicitly ask the list instead of implicitly asking
   them on the list and explicitly asking everyone elsewhere.
   Can't change what's been done, but I'm sure John Young will welcome
   your advice on what to publish and when, and with what redactions
   exactly as much as I do. Feel free to keep criticizing my not asking
   the list enough, but I'm done with that pointless debate.
   Still not convinced? Here's John's take on leaking and reactions: "We
   would have dumped it, the whole thing. Everyone else likes to play this
   game: 'What if we harm somebody' or all this kind of crap. Which is
   strictly cowardice."

   On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Cari Machet <[1]carimachet@gmail.com>
   wrote:

     Sir i am not in your head

     I get it john young leaked logs you pointed it out he waffled and
     then did admit it but sir you also leaked logs unredacted and i see
     no evidence of an ask by you of this list for help

     It could have been "hey is anyone interested in helping me get
     through this difficulty with a compromised log of a site" simple
     stuff ... if no one replied another more pointed ask could have come
     but instead you replicated

     Listen have a think on what is being critisized about your process
     ... criticizm can be healthy to absorb and we can shift out like
     that ...thru council with others we can have many minds

   On Oct 10, 2015 8:50 PM, "Michael Best" <[2]themikebest@gmail.com>
   wrote:

   Did you see the first one where I asked for help verifying the
   information in redacted form, specifically from John Young/Cryptome but
   in no way excluding the list?
   Or that after I posted the redacted version of the logs, and before
   John Young first denied they were real (before denying it again then
   admitting it again), he sent me an email saying ""Keep at it."
   Or my general request on Twitter, which wasn't limited to the list and
   occurred after the list had been alerted to the
   matter? [3]https://twitter.com/NatSecGeek/status/651760609189568512

     Ok i read it all see no fucking ask of this community for help on
     the matter

References

   1. mailto:carimachet@gmail.com
   2. mailto:themikebest@gmail.com
   3. https://twitter.com/NatSecGeek/status/651760609189568512