If Mike had uploaded them without full inspection, no problem. But, as I understand the narrative, he knowingly uploaded them. I found them after uploading them, as I and the Daily Dot article said. He discovered the files when he uploaded the contents of the sticks to the Internet Archive, Best told the Daily Dot in a Twitter message. “Scrolling down through the list, I found about a hundred awstats log files listed in a row,” he said, referring to Cryptome analytics data. On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Michael Best <[1]themikebest@gmail.com> wrote: To prove the GCHQ slide could've been fake, getting John to fix the leak and stop calling me a liar. Same as I've said all along. How is that implausible? On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Razer <[2]Rayzer@riseup.net> wrote: Got it. Totally altruistic motivation... On 10/10/2015 01:46 PM, Michael Best wrote: "Any money" is still more than I'll make off this. My only compensation is a headache from ridiculous accusations. Any chance you hold this same standard to Snowden and consider his press coverage as "an ongoing for-profit commercial motivation as redistributor" for the NSA docs? Sent from my iPhone On Oct 10, 2015, at 16:39, Razer <[3]Rayzer@riseup.net> wrote: On 10/10/2015 01:35 PM, Michael Best wrote: Nope, laughing at someone who has no idea how little a media mention is worth in terms of money. Sent from my iPhone Yes I do and it depends on how much money you consider 'money'... For some, paying the rent is enough. Ask any artist or musician. RR On Oct 10, 2015, at 16:33, Razer <[4]Rayzer@riseup.net> wrote: Nervous laugh... On 10/10/2015 01:32 PM, Michael Best wrote: I say Best's name's appearance in DailyDot or any other media constitutes an ongoing for-profit commercial motivation as redistributor. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. References Visible links 1. mailto:themikebest@gmail.com 2. mailto:Rayzer@riseup.net 3. mailto:Rayzer@riseup.net 4. mailto:Rayzer@riseup.net Hidden links: 6. mailto:Rayzer@riseup.net