That was it, that the slide might not be authentic or could have been
   an internal GCHQ mockup. I thought that was worthy of discussion and
   exploration, but then [1]John accused me of faking the data.

     Juan [2]juan.g71@gmail.com
     Thu Oct 8 08:58:03 EDT 2015
     On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 17:26:51 -0400
     Michael Best <[3]themikebest@gmail.com> wrote: > In summary, I
     showed that the information on the slide could have > been mocked
     up, depsite matching the logs for Cryptome.org. Supposing it was
     true that you proved that *maybe* the
     slide isn't authentic, what then? Are you trying to make a more
     general point? Amd that point
     is...?

References

   1. https://twitter.com/Cryptomeorg/status/651777707873837056
   2. mailto:juan.g71@gmail.com?Subject=Re: Cryptome has been leaking its user logs for over a year&In-Reply-To=<56166710.4237370a.4285d.552d@mx.google.com>
   3. mailto:themikebest@gmail.com