On 7/16/15 11:44 AM, grarpamp wrote:

On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Shelley [1]<shelley@misanthropia.org> wrote:

On July 16, 2015 10:24:23 AM "Stephen D. Williams" [2]<sdw@lig.net> wrote:


On 7/16/15 7:51 AM, Georgi Guninski wrote:

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:02:31AM -0700, Stephen D. Williams wrote:

In a lot of ways, this is an elegant solution and could arguably be
much more secure than desktop apps in Windows.  Assuming your

Lol, is this positive or negative argument?

it can hardly be less secure than windoze imho.



Cypherpunks + Windows, what do you think?

It's making me break out in hives, stop it!  :p

*shudder*

The bazillion lines of effectively unaudited code in opensource
kernels and software should have the same effect upon you.

   I personally have audited quite a bit of FOSS (and enough spot checkers
   can get pretty good coverage), but not one line of proprietary
   Microsoft, Oracle, or Apple code.  Your fears may be misplaced.
   sdw

References

   1. mailto:shelley@misanthropia.org
   2. mailto:sdw@lig.net