2015-06-25 21:44 GMT+09:00 z9wahqvh <[1]z9wahqvh@gmail.com>:

     this is absolutely tremendous, original, and insightful. in my
     opinion.

   This is exceedingly strange coming from an In-Q-Tel security officer.
   In-Q-Tel basically invests in anything performing more collections in
   the US. Does Dan Geer worry for the future, and effectively betray
   In-Q-Tel? Does he want to prevent anyone else from getting the nice
   intel? What exactly does he want to make information processors liable
   for?
   How can law prevent third parties associating freely available
   information?

References

   1. mailto:z9wahqvh@gmail.com