On May 25, 2015 9:38 PM, "Cari Machet" <[1]carimachet@gmail.com> wrote:
   >
   > Oh so sorry jim here:
   >
   >
   [2]http://www.Recode.net/2015/05/24/twitter-suspends-troll-chuck-johnso
   n-are-its-new-guidlines-actually-working/
   >
   > Specifically he tweeted:
   >
   > 'Go to [3]gotnews.com/donate if you want to give money to taking out
   @deray.'
   >
   > On May 25, 2015 2:34 PM, "John Young" <[4]jya@pipeline.com> wrote:
   >>
   >> Disks or any electro-mechanical device, may not be the only, or
   >> principle, means of storage. So capacity may not be the measure
   >> of capability.
   >>
   >> The need for speed of access to and processing of data requires
   >> the data to be in active memory all the time. Arrayed, large
   CPU-like
   >> "chips" or solid state (best is unsolid state) processors make data
   >> constantly usable, always up to date, no lag time, no wear and tear.
   >>
   >> Physical disks use too much energy and require too much architecture
   >> to rack, interconnect, house, energize, maintain, repair, replace,
   update.
   >> And are way too slow and clunky.
   >>
   >> However, this doesn't mean Utah Data Center is not useful as a
   >> Potemkin deception. Or that much of it is Potemkin deception.
   >> Why else make it so observable during funding, design, construction
   >> and afterwards a juicy easily photographed, concentrated target of
   >> sneaky weaponry of hardware, software, sneakerware, hey come
   >> attack us ware.
   >>
   >> Somewhere, in Utah, or the planet, there are data handlers about
   >> which little is publicly known except as miniaturized examples on
   >> personal playthings. Meanwhile we are fed out of date fantasies of
   >> capability based on xxx-bytes of increasingly absurd prefixes which
   >> are like innumerable angels on pinheads.
   >>
   >> One way to spot what's what is to look at the generators of
   facilities.
   >> And their fuel tanks. Fully active data require a lot of
   uninterruptable
   >> juice. We traced the power lines for UDC and found they lead far
   >> astray, also Potemkin. Could be the generators and fuel tanks are
   >> too.
   >>
   >> This is not to suggest Snowden pushing crypto and dribbling docs
   >> are Potemkin. Could be, though, so slow and clunky, so observable,
   >> and publishable for those willing to suspend disbelief.
   >>
   >>
   >>
   >> At 12:22 AM 5/25/2015, you wrote:
   >>>
   >>> Is Fox News illegal? You'd say it's illegal to deceive people. The
   sheer quantity of false information on Fox News, and it's popularity,
   are a serious harm to America.
   >>>
   >>> Is it that free markets only perform properly with rational agents?
   >>
   >>
   >>

References

   1. mailto:carimachet@gmail.com
   2. http://www.Recode.net/2015/05/24/twitter-suspends-troll-chuck-johnson-are-its-new-guidlines-actually-working/
   3. http://gotnews.com/donate
   4. mailto:jya@pipeline.com