On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 6:49 AM, rysiek <[1]rysiek@hackerspace.pl>
   wrote:
   > The way it is, you don't have such control. So you would be giving
   these away
   > to some orgs you don't like hoping this will get them in hot water
   with the
   > NSA/the government.
   > ...
   > Either way, a bad, bad idea
   Oh, agreed. I was joking when I suggested spreading the malware.
   (People keep telling me that my (alleged) sense of humor will get me in
   trouble one of these days. Meh, hasn't happened yet.)
   > I work in an NGO that tries to be at least
   > partially funded by donations, and it's fucking hard.
   I'd say it's a case of the 10% making the rest look bad, but really,
   every single NFP whose accounting I've seen has had something to hide.
   It's not always excessive perqs for the bosses (and only for the
   bosses; one of the things to hide is just how much the boss's little
   extras cost while she tells the staff that there just isn't the money
   to give any of them pay raises this year), sometimes it's just the
   level of overhead. One person was telling me that they needed to
   conceal their overhead level because if they reported the actual level
   they would lose donations to "more efficient" charities ... who also
   were lying in their financials.

References

   1. mailto:rysiek@hackerspace.pl