In general what grarpamp said is true, however we should remember that
   I2P (aka Invisible Internet Protocol) is designed to be "a real
   undernet" and thus it is focused mostly on hidden services and
   invisible hosting. It results in fact that there is much less
   outproxies than in TOR network. Using I2P to acces a "standard"
   Internet but in anonymous way is much less efficient than via TOR only
   because of that design issue, moreover I2P is just less popular than
   TOR and has less participating nodes, what additionally decreases it's
   efficiency.
   Zegar
   On 4 July 2014 23:04, grarpamp <[1]grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:

     On 7/4/14, grarpamp <[2]grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
     >
     [3]https://www.blackhat.com/us-14/briefings.html#you-dont-have-to-be
     -the-nsa-to-break-tor-deanonymizing-users-on-a-budget
     I2P is a tool that likely presents the nearest analog to Tor's
     hidden
     services (.i2p) to the user. Usable in much the same way.
     Always good to be familiar with and have other options out there.
     And see that they receive community research and review efforts too.
     [4]http://geti2p.net/en/comparison/tor

References

   1. mailto:grarpamp@gmail.com
   2. mailto:grarpamp@gmail.com
   3. https://www.blackhat.com/us-14/briefings.html#you-dont-have-to-be-the-nsa-to-break-tor-deanonymizing-users-on-a-budget
   4. http://geti2p.net/en/comparison/tor