(need to clarify this statement so it makes some sense...)

   so, any given issue like [work] or [school] as a perspective
   is likely unshared because it does not parse the same across

   generations, and oftentimes an older constituency of the state,
   those most privileged and served by the existing corruption,

   seem to think their views superior and more knowing of the

   conditions and accurate - instead of out of touch and out of
   date, nostalgic and unreal to others existing in very different

     circumstances and parameters and dynamics, generations
     upon generations subsidized by handouts from the retired-
     class, who have all the money not inside billionaires coffers

   i believe the "success" of the capitalist system based on money
   as primary value - from individual scaled up to local/global state -
   is an ILLUSION. a fiction that is not supported by facts evaluated
   in terms other than money (that is, where money equates w/truth)
   an earlier generation benefited by the existing system and then
   collapsed. such that, once upon a time a person could get a
   decent education, a living wage job, pay their bills, marry and
   have a family, own a vehicle, purchase a house (e.g. $10,000
   about 40 years ago that today may be $150,000 and upwards),
   and then even start a business, or have a thing aka 'a career',
   that would be a path towards retirement, relaxation in old age
   those who succeeded, especially at a higher rate of profitability
   then could support their children and make up the gap, where
   school began to cost more money, house mortages needed a
   downpayment which parents could pay as gift, or a car would
   be purchased as a leg up, especially as living wage becomes
   few and far between, college debt balloons, the family unit
   collapses thus foundational social relations evaporates, and
   yet these weaknesses could be managed by those with such
   larger financial connections. and if they - the children - succeed
   in this system, it is viewed as the system is working and not
   that it is based on subsidizing it within the basic parameters,
   via those who have more wealth propping up those who do not
   the myth of 'self-made' person then, that hoary arrogant belief
   is not only based on a corrupt implementation that benefits a
   few people at the expense of the many, structurally, it also is
   based on a privilege utilized and extended by those who have
   money, as it subsidizes their staying 'within the system' as if
   more competitive and fit, morally superior, than those without
   such an additional support structure. survival then can largely
   depend on existing wealth in proximity to an individual who is
   otherwise in a situation supposedly on the level with others,
   and in this way, basic relations and dynamics often involve
   string-pulling or behind-the-scenes influence to how various
   situations play out, as if ~natural, based on competition or
   superior skills or ability, than having one person financed by
   a hidden investor and others not, as it whittles away people
   who can do more than be subsidized, follow rules, draw in
   the lines, not upset investors or risk the support structure;
   (so too, 'father figure' as if god, moral, wise, all that bullshit)
   it is systematic private tutelage required for the 'capitalist'
   system to _appear to work, as it is then represented that
   people are independent, pulling themselves up by their own
   bootstraps, versus having (really, actually, public) subsidies
   (via theft of the commons). so this is to say 'parents' and-or
   'families' can provide this over generations, depending also
   on exactly how wealthy they are- such that grandparents
   can contribute to college via retirement funds or whatever,
   stock dividends for a given year- while also checking their
   social security because- you know, ~it is 'their money'...
   (in such a way that working poor are subsidizing the rich,
   and this pressure then increases the yearly livability gap)
   at the top of society and the top of this heat of madness is
   'superman', the male head of household, whose spouse or
   wife -if not yet divorced- has likely sacrificed her goals and
   her freedoms to allow this illusion of mastery to develop...
   one person's freedoms sacrificed for freedoms of another
   (though this also happens on a mass scale). the 'man' is
   then the person who "thinks" and "knows" and "decides"
   and financial success is tied to his success and abilities;
   again, an illusion. divorce an indication this is imbalanced
   as a relational condition- spouse as servant or handmaid.
   so too entire families can prop up the narcissistic ego of
   'the breadwinner' who then conquers society, hunts prey
   to gain survival and existence, and then this belief in his
   superiority based on success in these defined parameters.
   i am good at business- i am a warrior! etc. identity of man
   funneled into certain functioning that is removed of goals
   and views outside his own immediate need, this privilege
   then equated with larger social responsibility as it maps
   to the state at large, he is the soldier fighting the war by
   pursuing his own self interest, he is the competitor, the
   decider, the succeeder, the intellect, the champion of
   his own life and those who he supports around him.
   the problem is that it is mostly bullshit, based on lies.
   that this 'survival of the fittest' is highly rigged, based on
   special and unique privileges, corruption, not accounting
   for truth, and believing in inhuman values that govern over
   social and other relations by default, as if emancipatory,
   an ideal model for state functioning, best of all possible
   worlds, where it is his world, his ideas, his goals and
   beliefs, his interests first, that define, manage, evaluate
   the shared situation in his onesided terms and views,
   while errors are ignored based on higher authority as if
   a godhead, infallible, because 'he' is -history- effectively
   so some massive shithead like this then spreads the word
   as if simpleton business philosophy is real deal; concepts
   like [property] and [capital] and [work] and also [education]
   are brought to bear for constructing and relaying his POV...
   so this warped privileged, false-perspective then is shared
   and communicated about as if _standard, its corruption and
   false portrayal and non-accountability then normalized as if
   the measure by which other actions are held against, judged
   by virtue of 'what works' without calculating it beyond money
   [property] to this bastard fuck is having an education and
   degree lined up, a wife, a family, a house, vehicles, house,
   (probably cabin or perhaps additional real estate), career,
   vacations, travel, stuff beyond what any person needs (as
   this relates to inefficiency and hoarding of material goods)
   others in another generation may not even have a family
   structure, they may not attain an education or degree that
   allows career or work in field of interest, a living income is
   likely not available, they cannot afford a house, they have
   no spouse or even social relations potentially, they could
   not afford a vehicle, or to maintain it, or insurance, they
   may not have enough for food or clothing, they live within
   the property of another as renter, they never had a vacation,
   they cannot travel, and they fall outside culture due to lack
   of access or barriers to participation, and many view them
   as leeches and parasites of society for taking _away wealth
   from the succeeding and working class, even while systems
   that sustain these others or that they function within are the
   very cause for this incapacitation and state of degradation
   so the very ideology that is judging the 'failures' as immoral
   is the reason for this structural condition- its very -success-
   and yet this maps to a view that those with money are better
   than those without, more virtuous, by natural ability in terms
   of competition, versus this situation rigged to benefit some
   at the cost of many, while not allowing it to be accounted for
   because it is only evaluated in terms of money, not of its truth
   'handouts' from the rich to those dependent whether legally or
   not, say children of these benefactors of state corruption, then
   create the false perspective that these 'citizens' thus subsidized
   are actually succeeding in the original parameters and are not
   propped up by those who actually benefited the most, and thus
   trickle-down is intergenerational from within family bloodlines,
   and not outside this private context, unless somehow views of
   philanthropy are equated with providing people with a fair and
   equal chance of success in competition-- that is not occurring.
   instead it is symbolic, to make it appear as if the system works
   in its functioning, that its ideological principles and beliefs are
   fundamentally 'true' based on continuing -subsidized- successes
   this is not 'a little grease in the wheel', this is requirement of
   having the grease canister perpetually attached to the wheel
   while others must go and function without, a deficit or gap
   which structurally and knowingly leads to their demise. this
   is the lie, that religious view that cannot be challenged and
   such heresy is quickly medicated away as rantings of crazy
   persons who are jealous and inferior, greedy, selfish, unkind
   thus, a view of [property] if evaluated in this range of potential
   interactions, could be a condition of power and mastery, over
   others and supposedly over the self (by way of narcissistic ego)
   and it can inherently involve subjugation of others to maintain or
   sustain this view which remains unaccounted for, whereas these
   other views of property are from the perspective of subjugation,
   of having these idiot superior fucks gloating about their power
   and supporting their weak-thinking genetic herds of monetists
   who think society only revolves around them and their needs,
   that they are the determiners of value, while truth of this is
   not accounted for beyond private limits and beliefs, which
   the corrupt US constitution allows as a warped prerogative
   entire professions based on this belief system, 'disciplines',
   modes of being, this enronomic inflation of shared ungrounded
   value held in common, the basis for 'mechanics of property' as
   this becomes economists, lawyers, businessmen, entrepreneurs
   who benefit from this condition and work to extend it for a limited
   shared set they belong to. in this way, the hypothesis that such
   corrupt capitalism is indistinguishable from corrupt communism,
   that it is entirely materialist, value is based on money, its control
   and 'thinking is bad' that does not conform to the belief system,
   and can be edited out, censored, destroyed, as if a moral action
   this idea of freedom at the cost of others, such that 'equal rights'
   are then taken away via this structural imbalance, is what then
   legitimizes the false view, that they are free to hold these views,
   it is their legal right as enshrined in signed documents and thus
   such activity is signed-off-on at the level of the 'unshared state'
   what is so absolutely totally crazy about this is that it is modeled
   as if a natural system, an ecosystem. though the structural bias
   has been normalized as if implicit in nature, such that some must
   be unemployed while others do the work or some must live while
   others must die off, so that 'the group' succeeds. the problem with
   this view is that it is artificial, nowhere in nature is a natural
   system
   likely allowing structural inefficiency to be normalized to subsidize
   the 'partial organism'. this is not the bird killing some of its young
   so that others can live scenario, given harsh resource conditions.
   it is something far beyond that, an ideological compromise that
   has become normalized. it is to consider a macro-organism in
   such a way that its 'economy' is only measured within subset
   relation of the whole, and not the entire entity as this economy
   in other words: success of the partial organism or ecosystem
   is isolated from its cost to sustain in those terms of functioning
   such that it is a false ecosystem, a fake view of involved events
   because its analysis is bounded to only 'what works' within the
   'partial model' or subset, and not within the larger total society
   as organism. and thus 'the economy' that is profiting is based
   on the entropic removal of value (truth and money) from a larger
   condition, to support and sustain a smaller version inside of it,
   yet which is parasitic, requiring failure of the whole system so
   that the part can succeed, in this way it is self-cannibalistic
        (public.state (private state))  ===> (loss(profit))
   the entropic exchange then removes value, hoards it with the
   few, exploits these dynamics by an enforced boundary '(' or limit,
   which then is based on beliefs that are beyond further accounting
   in their truth, such that 'shared belief' is equated with this 'truth'
   yet
   is not actually so, it is simply a 'shared view' of shared
   self-interest
   of some subset or group or identity, such as man and mankind...
      (human (woman (man (mankind))))  --->  'man' (humanity)
   private superman and his ego as shared or unshared thus is able
   to rule over humanity, even if the beliefs are not based in truth or
   are warped, because of the power of money to force perspective,
   shared relations, communications, language into that framework
   (thank lawyers for giving the final seal of approval, courts as well)
   so when 'men' relate or private shared identities (i dunno, let us
   say antihuman homosexuals for instance) then humanity can be
   kept out of this 'shared public' interest, and one population or group
   and its interests can function against other, via economic means
   as normalized, streamlined, made mainstream as if shared value
   it is so devious it would have to be planned this way. it is just too
   warped to not be evaluated in more realistic terms, and yet-- and
   yet... that is exactly what happens. people routinely call up the
   iconic signage, the functions and protocols of [property] and can
   reference these as if standard, known, shared ideas of a common
   view or understanding, not accounting for the variance involved,
   and thus in referring to these 'views' or perspective in only partially
   grounded ways, it further supports and relies upon the falsity that
   they develop and allow, as ideological structures, such that the
   views of money are automatically unpacked as interpretations,
   foundation for analysis, that is thus friction-free in calling out or
   referencing such parameters, without accounting for their truth
   in a context beyond linear language, which is the predicament
   thus communication and language enforce the falsity by their
   continued and automatic use, continuing to repaint the views
   anew and afresh as if legitimate, stamps of approval to previous
   modeling now detached from realistic accounting for what exists
   and held and believed as religion, with faith in these views that
   then becomes and is the problem, the righteousness of viewpoint
   that can be ungrounded, a false perspective and framework that
   does not map to reality and instead sustains, aids the corruption
   the ideological view has been expertly engineered- rationalized,
   all it needs is to be used, employed and deployed, especially
   as if a theory - proven as physical law, versus hypothesis with
   error correction where the working-model is readily evaluated
   versus becoming dogma, an enforced belief beyond questioning
   or challenge. in this way, pseudo-truth replaces truth as value
   it gets crazy real fast- think of it, the realm of subsidy extending
   from a millionaire class and dependents, quasi new.royal lineage;
   the 'representatives' of the state and sports ~heroes alike, icons
   of the success of the system -- that it works -- for those like them
   (who the fuck would pay to watch commercials? the same people
   who pay to watch millionaires play sports in rigged competitions)
   this is the success story that supposedly validates the merits of
   the capitalist system in its privatization and enclavement, as it is
   represented by private wo|man and their demographic kind, this
   at the cost of humanity, earth, nature, life, love, sanity, truth
   itself
   only 'economics', 'politics', 'society' divorced from truth could allow
   this as a viewpoint, sustaining it as 'shared reasoning' within what
   is a highly protected boundary or border -- borders everywhere --
   not only in physical though also mental property, gatekeepers of
   the mind and thinking, what modeling or viewpoints are allowed,
   as this aligns with institutionalized views, ideological, dogmatic,
   beneficial to the same expropriating flows of labor and material
   and value, while standing in as protesters against this, benefiting
   and relying upon the very thing stood against, via this ungrounded
   condition, 'shared belief' the delusional interconnection, dependency
   and literally- privilege, where conceit and hypocrisy go hand in hand
   those people over there making a survivable income are bad while
   my survivable income over here is morally superior, because belief
   it is all part of the same thing, just more major or minor variations-
   the success of the billionaires is the success of college graduates;
   it is the same fucking system, the same monetary values driving
   the interactions, bringing home the bread. to think otherwise is
   delusional, in so far as it partakes in language, communications,
   these exchanges in terms outside logical accounting for its truth-
   it is the very thing which sustains the ongoing development, that
   the terms it exists within as ideologically defined are the foundation
   for subsequent interactions-- that this 'history' is not challenged at
   the level of core ideas, and instead merely referenced, as another
   programming function or call or routine, more oil in the wheels, as it
   further fuses materialistic beliefs of capitalism/communism together
   as if some kind of liberation, greater freedom, via increased bondage
   and reliance upon structures, institutions, corrupted organizations
   and shared identities that can be manufactured and manipulated,
   subverted as a centuries-old practice, such hidden engineering
   'the group' identity, some subset of private demographics, then
   directly equates with this oppression- difference as universalized,
   the fragmentary as if whole, in its warp and skew and unreality,
   and then to mediate situations on these 'shared terms' that are
   requiring of further oppression against the common human set;
   because people cannot get beyond themselves, they lost their
   own truth and identity to culture and institutions defining it for
   them in other terms, relations in superficial constructs as if all
   about freedom and 'think whatever you like' because it is easy
   to just believe its true, no one is going to falsify your viewpoint
   in a context of money as the value, the determining evidence
   in this way, 'ideas' and 'intellectualism' likewise a trap unless
   taken outside the prevailing normalized context. any reference
   to security or 'the economy' defaults to this corruption, this
   deep structural oppression and subjugation of populations
   supported by the false ideas and views, relations and beliefs
   then consider being duped, that there is an invading force of
   people who have a hostile agenda and are citizens standing
   side by side with us, as if fellow citizens yet hostile to these
   very 'ideas' and principles that go beyond monetary viewpoints
   the mainstream interactions and use of language, communication
   favor their agenda by default, and overtime it is the only viewpoint
   that can be reasoned in the faith-based system of money-as-truth
   that this 'historic' loss of freedom, and 'mankind' as fiction is
   also what is allowing this takeover and takedown of the state to
   occur, within these same parameters, due to lost accounting for
   actual truth in society, replaced by beliefs shared by benefactors
   of the system, the subsidization, the privilege, superiority complex
   as if natural ability and capacity, not gained by kneecapping others
   and locking the gate, ignoring all that because it benefits self first
   as privately defined, again, extension of private ego, ~superman
   though this warped view subsidized by oppression of surrounding
   others, spouses, the public, the future, those without resources
   a human viewpoint would quickly resolve this, unless there is a
   fight within the self disallowing it, which is thus a schizophrenic
   condition of fragmentary puzzlework that is not aligned correctly
   enough to get a new model or 'governance' in these terms, then
   it is a fight within the self, wo|man or human, as this can flip-flop
   back and forth, especially as it relates to truth and money, such
   that a condition of superposition exists for how interpretation and
   action grounds, in its accuracy, based on what motivations and
   structures, the circuitry of existence as mind and body relate
   in such a condition of [democracy] where hostile forces exist
   as voters and constituencies seek to fortify the corrupt state,
   another concept such as [dictatorship] could likewise have a
   range of interpretations, based on parameters it functions within
   and thus a 'democracy of moneymakers' may require checks-
   and-balances of a dictatorship of truth hidden as governance,
   somewhere deep within the shadows as backup structure, it is
   also a threat if 'dictator-of-moneymaker' was to align with this
   'democracy-of-moneymakers' likewise. so even a context such
   as mass surveillance, hidden dictatorship, failed democracy,
   in their truth could still involve moral and ethical governance in
   terms of humans as the shared set. though if an observer is
   not evaluated in 'human terms' it is not possible to evaluate
   these situations in that larger structural viewpoint, and also
   evidence may be lacking to support such a view or belief
   until 'people' begin communicating in these more realistic
   frameworks, what is communicating and exchanged as views
   supports the failed state in its oppressive dynamics and goals.
   by standardizing and extending and normalizing the false, it is
   giving it currency as if truth, which is validated by its effects, in
   terms of profit and money as evidence of its reality, tangibility,
   as if money proves things, and also limits, defines this proof
   as with property, when someone has ideas for how to deal
   with this situation, in the past they may have had a career,
   a livelihood. today instead, ideas to 'fix' the corrupt state are
   unwanted, ignored, or abolished, instead, such people are
   viewed ~mentally-ill for not conforming to the worldview. is
   this really the foundation for freedom, and not for slavery?
   also, for those most invested in the status quo, they are
   more reliant on the lies that structure this mechanism for
   their own 'success' and survival. they have reason to believe
   because it benefits them most. in this way, the illusion that
   they exist in a greater realm of awareness and truth due to
   functioning inside the system is an illusion. there are more
   lies at the top of this false framework than at the bottom,
   where it is more readily observable the gap needed to be
   able to sustain the false perspective, viewpoints, beliefs
   that is, if truth is value. if money is the supreme value and
   virtue aligns with this, then 'greatest truth' would be with
   those with all the money, which is the cosmic setup, in
   that materialists then congregate together, and can then
   be mapped out, dealt with accordingly via future accounting
   in other words, the more connected a person is within the
   system the more reliant upon lies needed to sustain it and
   oppression of others, though this can be left out or removed
   from analysis, which is part of the hypocrisy of the privileged
   in this way the bane of causes, champions of issues who
   then function against these same parameters in human terms
   outside the economic model, where money determines truth
   it is as if the body replaces the mind as 'governer' and that
   physical proof that is materialistic is viewed highest evidence
   when instead this is actually accounted for in terms of money,
   in these same circuits, though within a shared 'group view' or
   belief system - again religion. whatever it is called, Marxist
   or Keynesian or Head-start or Obamacare or whateverthefuck
   in this way, zombies.culling of populations who do not conform
   or submit or shared demographics based within and upon a
   shared ideology, this falling into line, following, as if freedom,
   liberty, channeling efforts into the wrong circuits, agendas,
   and goals, though those which can be mechanized/realized
   within the existing false frameworks and parameters, though
   not reviewed for their integrity, which then is the basis for easy
   subversion, mimicry, camouflage for another hidden agenda
   not thinking-it-through at the level of logical analysis beyond
   binary then leads to this use of 'emanicpatory ideas' as a
   main form of oppression, via group think as institutionalized,
   whether alternative or countercult or not, authority-based that
   is again 'individual rights' scaled to society as warped universal
   the very problem and issue is communication, language, action
   in these terms- the very exchange in pseudo-truth allowing the
   whole edifice of lies and falsity to be maintained by not going
   several steps further, into the depths, to address the structures
   involved, the errors relied upon, and therefore these extended,
   becoming the basis for interactions, the basis for livelihoods,
   yet another brick in the wall, no matter what opinions or views
   held, reliant upon the very system, without self-consciousness
   or self-reflection or modeling skills or capacity to address and
   correct for errors, because society has been made _illiterate
   by these very same forces, interactions with self and others,
   relations and exchange occurring in majority falsity instead,
   shared beliefs as if truth when it just is not this simple
   and it is a shared condition, everyone exists in this, as if the
   cosmos has fallen in its truth, where truth was never secured
   and it is only getting worse and worse, more and more difficult
   to continue in the existing parameters, pressures increasing,
   and that enormous gap, within the self perhaps and also with
   others, every other a unique consideration of dimensionality,
   how relations wire or align or do not interconnect. how to go
   from existentialist alienation and nausea to shared human
   awareness, especially if 'private ego' is the standard POV
   a limit or boundary of observers, interpretation existing, this
   human view requires comprehension of true nature of self,
   a remodeling of relations internal and external, governance
   in these terms, which likely already exists yet may not be
   primary due to circumstance and prior decision-making if
   compass is misaligned or dealing in hostile force-fields to
   begin with, which is the default scenario, this detachment
   and to mention the hypocrisy of seeking to account for this,
   the antagonism of a lost humanity, the very people who do
   the most, seek the higher ideals then scrutinized for these
   efforts because of the way the circuitry actually functions
   is not as believed or perceived in private terms of identity
   as shared, subset, perhaps turned into careers, et cetera.
   this brutal awakening of the other which is humanity, in
   its loss of position and value of the state to the alter-ego
   of the self, fallen from grace, delusional and dangerous
   at its core there is love, in this securing of truth it is to
   redeem the internecine battles by a higher awareness
   and understanding that cannot escape tribulations of
   difference, opposition, disconnection, misalignment
   the economy, governance, social relations could be
   based on shared truth as a human value, instead of
   money. that could be how justice is determined and
   freedom is protected. and within this, love as a value
   and principle that has been removed from relations
   between people, except insofar as it is monetary
   it is to consider perspective, interpretation of observers
   who may view the same events yet parse them differently
   [evil] actions and [good] actions are variable, relative to
   the parameters evaluated within, based on what is of value
   for an antihuman materialist who believes money is truth,
   the basis for their objectivity, evil actions may map to those
   (such as the poor) who take away their money or who they
   must subsidize beyond their private frameworks, and thus
   rationalized subversion, exploitation, could be believed just
   and it could even become a malethical structural of the state,
   such that expropriation of resources to the rich set is ~divine,
   thus actions like these would be 'good', of highest virtue, etc
   whereas if this same situation was evaluated in terms of
   grounded truth, accurately determining what is good or evil
   would requires accounting for what is evil in terms of its truth,
   and what is good in terms of its truth, as concepts, as this
   maps to a shared human identity. an evil action could be
   viewed as taking away the ability to live from many people
   so that only few can live at their expense. good could be
   evaluated of those efforts that seek to remedy this situation
   though it may be limited by what is acknowledged as true,
   what can be recognized, and thus partialness is involved,
   as 'truth may not be separated from falsity' (as pT) and
   thus 'good intentions' could actually support evil actions
   unwittingly, an endless army of trojan horses in civilization,
   due to not establishing and securing this logical foundation
   beyond the binary, resulting in ideological shared beliefs
   that while believed 'true' and 'good' could function otherwise
   as the parameters are not adequately accounted for in the
   ways they exist beyond limits of relation as conceived or
   believed within the shared set, also benefiting enemies.
   in this way, 'monetary truth' ultimately can determine what
   is true, whether or not it is true, and also presume it 'good'
   because it is shared as a belief, as a consensus viewpoint,
   as if morality even if for different ends and opposed agendas;
   both grounding to the same shared false perspective ultimately
   that is how ideology has defeated ideas in their truth, its
   currency has more value in the working system and those
   who profit from it function as its prophets, extending beliefs,
   indoctrinating new disciplines, maintaining false frameworks
   at the cost of humanity, a real accurate model of what exists
   beyond private ID, accountable to truth as its measurement,
   for worth, for value, for relations, governance, exchange, etc.
   every human being has valuable insights into this situation,
   everyone who thinks and feels has details, views, observations
   to contribute to modeling what is going on, from their vantage.
   what is required to do this is 'knowing your 1s and 0s' in terms
   of logic and probability, this allowing shared empirical reasoning
   where truth befits truth as shared structure and scaffolding in a
   hypothetical parallel modeling of this shared human condition;
   likewise, the truth of the billionaire and truth of the homeless,
   both of value. morality likewise, the human good that those
   with wealth do and those without, accounting for this, valuing
   it, establishing it as foundation, building upon such structure.
   (making it possible for thinkers to have sustainable employment
   for instance, versus viewing such modeling as without worth to
   others, think how this would have decimated previous generations,
   think-tankers would not be employed- they would be medicated,
   there would be no model for what is going on, and today, this is
   the extending situation into the future, an outdated and warped
   point-of-view that is inaccurate, the only guideposts available;
   unless people are willing to take on the situation and change it,
   transform it via shared action, work, support, within these terms)
   12-A1A [M]   512-C1B [4]   35-NET [8]