context: forgot to mention overriding hypothesis that state of
   insecure crypto - as with nukes - may be price of peace for
   cold war reunification in improved framework, thus structural
   duplicity has wider impact than inside states alone, could
   also bridge state-state secure relations in parallel with those
   that are insecure, allowing for advanced governing relations;
   in this way, broken crypto could represent deeper truth of
   the inside condition than what is able to be written about,
   yet exists as consciousness for those in the industry, etc,
   given what perspective, parameters, values, in the deception
   On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 11:45 AM, <[1]dan@geer.org> wrote:

      > 5) another realization upon hearing the 30c3 talk of Jacob
     Appelbaum
      > was the 'earth firewall' then indicates that the NSA controls the
     internet,
      > and that it is not operating as a subset within it, and instead
     everything
      > that occurs is within its domain....
     The Internet is not controlled, i.e., there is a power vacuum
     that will soon be filled.  There are many, many players and soon
     to be more.  The question to be contemplated, if any, is this:
     Do you prefer that the competing claims of control over the
     Internet be resolved by way of (1) dramatic Balkanization or
     by way of (2) making the Internet an organ of world government?
     A thought experiment, if needing one: is VoIP a part of the
     Internet or is it not, that is do you have two networks in your
     home/office or one?
     --dan

References

   1. mailto:dan@geer.org