sorry: brain damage. correction for brain-blip misinfo...

     so an illusion may exist or
     persist of 'no control' or 'wildness' while thoroughly accounted for
     at

   another level or layer, where the specs are closed by the originators

     and root of one level may NOT access root of another, or those
     combined

   (correction: root of one level may not access root of another)

   Hayek, Keynes, Hegel, Marx and others had 'some truth'

   yet it is not absolute truth within language as language,
   as it is mediated. these are signs, patterns, instead that
   are referenced, not truth itself. it is trap, just like when i

   refer to an author and seek to present their views yet this
   is a limit or skew is inherent and perhaps even inaccurate,

   not only my views though their views also, potentially also
   in error, not absolute in correctness, yet believed to be as
   if biblical conveyance that is to be knelt down before and

     served as if higher, even, as if guiding light, when that same
     light may not be as bright as direct observation shared by
     and between people of the same phenomena modeled in
     parameters more accurate or beyond those of the past

   mucked this up badly- was not to imply my writing biblical,
   instead that 'ideas' become theology, referenced text then
   have faith-based aspect institutionalized, structuralized as
   shared belief systems. sinning against ideology if going
   against consensus in its inaccuracy, all of it corruptible
   as ideas in their errored state and within language and
   social relations, as it becomes or is ungrounded, etc,
   then having this be the basis for exchange, development

     i think this same thing holds true for patents, of unshared
     identity which then splits and DIVIDES the shared condition
     into a 'shared group relation' as an ideological impossibility:

        (patent1a) <--> (patent1b) <--|--> (patent2)

   ...correction:  splits and divides the shared condition.
   (please ignore that it does not make grammatical sense)
   note: gotta say it, because it is relevant- i have social skills
   of a 10 year old, never developed or kept pace with others
   due to learning/behavioral deficit; not good with groups or
   social relations unless about ideas or internet comms;
   (aspergers) and, writing skills are horrendous, subpar
   by far, some of it involving deteriorated brain function.
   lysdexia also ubiquitous issue, i blame phonics.