forgot to mention: this fractional taxation that could be individually
   routed to issues then could be a way of funding basic science or
   studies or research outside of existing political frameworks and
   providing oversight or for 'increasing support' for agencies such as
   the GAO in the US, via what programs are given more prominence within
   policy (for instance if issues of EMFs and cancer and telephony were
   put into policy via directed tax funding).
   also: the income-based structure of whatever this 'routable tax
   percentage' may be called, would need to address vast income
   inequality, such that each citizen has a certain proportion though some
   citizens should not have a million-times more vote if wealthy and
   taxed. perhaps more of their taxes would go to the general system fund
   allocated to basic government operation, or some other way to keep the
   vote distributed by unique individual views versus dominated by those
   with most all the money, circulating and non-circulating.
   (which brings up the issue of paper currency as ultimate
   surveillance/monitoring system, if taking into account traffic analysis
   of money from points A to B to C ... to N. while credit and debit is
   more transparent about this, it is difficult to imagine a more useful
   model for flow of money through a chain than tracking paper currency in
   exchange and using this for all it is worth statistically,
   pre-internet, though computer-dependent to parse all the data.)