Lodewijk andré de la porte wrote:

   if you cannot pronounce truth, what other ways can you not perceive or
   produce it.

   apologies for delving deeper, it is a fascinating area to consider the
   dynamics involved at this threshold or juncture, because interpretation
   and relations can be defined and changed by the above mentioned
   criteria. thus how is the information modeled, in what dimensions,
   concepts, and abstraction...
   what might the word [истината] mean if the language is not known, and
   thus cannot be deciphered, decoded, or decrypted. might it operate on a
   visual level, like a rorschach test, via whatever is recognized, or is
   it instead ignored as a failed pattern match and thus upholds a
   boundary or perimeter between known and unknown, like and unlike.
   could it be possible to utilize these dynamics in other ways, such that
   graphic elements of dε|cθи-şλวực+相ή could be utilized across
   conventional boundaries and perhaps unlock other interpretative or
   structural layers, via ambiguity or alternative readings of the
   potentials involved with superposition of intrasign characters
   another way to consider this is that until now the [sign] has
   functioned as a whole concept, yet what if each letter was considered
   in its variability in terms of its potential <multiple> meanings. such
   that |e|a|c|h| letter could have variability, as demonstrated in HIOX
   dynamics, e.g. |a|e|n|y|.
   in terms of superposition of a given letter, how this ambiguity could
   shift meaning: |v|iew -> |c|iew, in phonetic terms (view, cue). in this
   context of superposition of variables and their n-potential, i like the
   comparison to juggling, as to what interpretation or pattern exists in
   a given viewpoint or contingent framework, yet that can be swapped out
   or evaluated in other patterning, as this relates to numerous available
   or unknown interpretations. inter-sign, yet also infra- and intra-sign.
   as these views could be grounded in some conceptual or methodological
   framework. for instance as cipher systems or whatnot.
   does the meaning of the word [nest] change with a variable character,
   such that |n|est could become ήest. perhaps suddenly the out-of-bounds
   extra information accessed via this new juxtaposition opens meaning,
   such that jest appears as a partial variable, as if a spread of an
   orbital cloud of electrons over their domain. another example: hat &
   hật, beyond pronunciation, graphically that the additional caret symbol
   (^) could be read as 'top hat' via symbolic processing, in some
   interpretative, arbitrary framework based on what is referenced and
   how, in what terms. graphically, outside the conventional language
   boundary, it could still be functional as graphic language or data in
   this way
   the issue then of subsign meaning as this relates to subtext and issues
   of bounded interpretation, where the lines are drawn- via what
   parameters of literacy. perhaps in this way 'not knowing' can open up
   potential readings, as if approaching a rosetta stone of meta-language.
   and yet keyboards are formatted in a particular way that prohibits and
   forbids this as a practice. though ascii emoticons and icons (say in
   instagram or other social media trinket-based visual feedback) are of
   this same nature, some repurposed for graphical use, to communicate and
   allow such symbolic communication and processing, relations and
   exchange in a perhaps similar realm of communication.
   i was going to be writing about this soon, typography and geometry, so
   will save the larger evaluation for that conveyance.
   there are examples of this same interpretative superposition within
   language that i wanted to share, to clarify the point and its use
   within culture. one is quite bleak, so the good things first...
   Olek example
   [1]https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151655052466759
   note: this could be evaluated in terms of a billboard and external
   armature, outside the frame of the [sign]. yet instead to focus just on
   the superposition of letters in the text within the boundary of the
   frame... what is the [word] in the frame? #cool, #bod, #cod, #cool,
   #God, #feel, #fool, #Bed, #66 eel, #GG ed, #Beef, #ceel, #coed, #Coal?
   how do each of these potential meanings change the relation between the
   observer, the self evaluating the event, and the surrounding context
   within the image. how does the meaning shift as the combined signs
   tabulate into different frameworks of reference. how does the circuitry
   transform.
   also, conceptualization of the situation itself, what if the frame is a
   magic device that shows someones hidden thoughts, as if a decrypting
   device, and that this is what the artist is potentially conveying, in
   terms of deep aesthetic insight and questioning.
   an attempt at approximating and mapping this superposition:
        # [c|GG|66|G|f|B] [o|e|e|oa|oo|ee|ed|od] [l|d|f]
   now you could go a long way with this, into what it potentially means.
   one interpretation could be 'bod' as it relates to body, where a face
   is unseen, and how the body of a female may not actually be grounded to
   an female-born entity, and could be a male in drag for instance. thus
   questions of [woman] and [man] as this may involve signage, versus
   grounding of the meaning of these words beyond a partial evaluation.
   such that superficially [man] could equate with driving a truck and
   drinking beers and having a dog, the image matching and pattern
   recognition of this. such that a [person] who is male, on a motorcycle
   who wears a leather jacket is automatically a man, while perhaps being
   completely subservient to a machine worldview and submitting to its
   values, no fight left in the person. yet perhaps costumed as if a rebel
   or somehow radical, etc, as signs may become props and so on. lots of
   not-tough-guys taking on the superficial appearance, ungrounded, as if
   roles. lots of females who in certain dimensions appear female yet are
   not. just like having ungrounded political analysis, such as
   ["republicans"] whose ideology actually maps to the far-left in terms
   of worldview and values. the image of the sign can be grounded in more
   than one way, given its hidden armature. how much is encrypted in
   boundaries that are not understood in the depths this way, or how much
   of knowledge and intelligence exists in being able to evaluate these
   situations accurately, learn, become literate of the issues and
   dimensions involved
   music is especially involved in this variability of language dynamic.
   listen to some song that you are trying to figure out the lyrics for,
   only to realize that someone wrote a different word in the lyrics than
   what you hear in the song- and yet it possibly ~could be misinterpreted
   or forced into that interpretation, or could be stretch there, yet it
   may also be mismatched, inauthentic, yet provide other meaning. i would
   say this variance is occurring in 50% or greater of the lyrics i have
   referenced, if not a higher percentage.
   (there are some artists who are adept at exploring these issues with
   language and meaning, and they are differentiated from others by their
   extreme aesthetic awareness, that aesthetics are a condition of their
   life values and consciousness, a higher level of awareness than is
   ordinary. Olek is certainly one of these rare birds, and others exist
   across various disciplines likewise, though i think they are actually
   the exception, it is natural talent born of intuitive understanding
   versus contrived and born of artifice)
   Santigold is another wild one... consider the lyrics to this song...
   Santigold - Rock This
   [2]http://music-mix.ew.com/2013/06/24/santigold-the-heat-soundtrack/
   cf. Rock This [shi-t|p], we [vicious|bitches], [fat|bad] bitches
   Santigold - The Keepers // aesthetics, boundaries, interpretation...
   [3]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZoHSce004M
   Santigold - Disparate Youth // masterful symbolism...
   [4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mIMMZQJ1H6E
   In relation to language techniques, in a 60 minutes Eminem discussed
   his technique...
   2010 Eminem 60 Minutes Interview // video
   [5]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HPSRqVXEQ4Y
   he confirms it involves 'bending the word' via its annunciation
   (5:04m), which can map into superposition of interpretation- how a
   subsign unit is ~processed or parsed as data. thus a word like [data]
   could be reinterpreted if d#ta was the condition, and spoken as [dota],
   for instance, this being my example. though it could inflect or spin or
   process and rewire meaning, sending it to different or multiple
   circuitry, especially in a looping condition of continual evaluation.
   thus, insight into consciousness, observation, relation itself as
   experience is tested against an empirical model, refined, error-checked
   and corrected, expanded beyond given parameters and boundaries, etc.
   thus the potential that each [l|e|t|t|e|r] in each word or concept or
   [s|i|g|n] or even their combination or relation, could shift or
   _recontextualize meaning via variability that leads to parallel
   structures of interpretation, different mappings and circuitry or
   co-existing frameworks, latent and hidden, overt and otherwise, perhaps
   even encrypted, [signs] as sarcophagi, the bones these entombed
   structures, of past lives revealed. thus what if every [sign] has other
   potential meaning buried within it as a potential, in that there could
   be some other dimensionality not accounted for yet accessible, say
   through a typoraphic error, and how that recontextualized and rewires
   meaning, say if a missing 'j' is revealed, or double jj, as r and g
   could structurally relate via a missing puzzle piece, though other
   evaluations are likewise possible. thus, rabbit holes into labyrinths,
   this
   there is a last example that is extremely disturbing and it gets to the
   subliminal use of these techniques. a local television commercial,
   likely non-profit, has lyrics to a song or jingle that have a very
   menacing double meaning. that context is forgotten is not particularly
   helpful either, though in general the commercial is of a 'helping
   nature' and about caring, etc. so when it sings, if remembering
   correctly: "wake the sun" or "wake the son", as this is repeated, it
   sounds very much like "rape the son, rape the son, rape the son". and
   this stuff is going on all the time in terms of semiotics and
   symbology. so what if that is a coded or programmed message that is
   formatting the behavior of someone via broadcasting an encrypted or
   encoded message and that their interpretation could find
   authority-based validation, ideological confirmation this way. well,
   without empirical truth no one could argue this is happening- it is all
   subjective and to consider this a person would have to be sick in the
   mind, etc, as plausible deniability goes. and yet these types of
   activities are everywhere, violence against women, subversion of
   principles and values, hatred, discrimination, contempt,
   anti-[religious] messaging, etc. the binary biasing allows this to
   proceed apace, as if subconscious, and if it cannot be named or
   grounded, rationalized in a sane worldview, it is madness to even speak
   about it or observe it because no one else will likely confirm it and
   then will say it does not exist, it is just imaginary, etc. this is
   what [signs] allow, in their surface manipulations.
   the boundary or limit or threshold of interpretation, the issue of
   pattern matching, then involves very deep and potentially disturbing
   correlations that are exploited and hacked and influence
   interpretations. yet likewise, if relating on this level, observing it,
   trying to deal with the reality, an enforcer of relativism could 'fix'
   the interpretation to a given limited boundary if the viewpoint is
   unfavored, via diagnosing mental illness and proscribing psychiatric
   treatment and corrective pills that numb the mind so that it receives
   such information uncritically, comfortably numb, xanaxed or otherwise.
   so there is danger to 'unshared interpretation' that is ungrounded,
   because it may be real madness though also 'unshared interpretation'
   that is grounded though unfavored, which calls for remedial action by
   those upholding the false perspective and managing rogue state
   this is why logic is needed to deal with these ambiguities, otherwise
   it is opinions in pseudo-truth reliant on false assumptions and
   frameworks by default, cherry-picking data to support views, ignoring
   others via binary ideology. and thus ungrounded binary evaluation in
   terms of "beliefs" based within consensus superficial language where
   signs are equated with truth, as *theorized*, versus grounded (1/N/0)
   logical evaluation based in empirical modeling of many simultaneous,
   parallel observers of the same event from its various angles, facets,
   structures, and dimensions, to error check and correct and improve upon
   the hypothesis.
   (i.e. how are claims of truth accounted for, as this relates to
   interpretation)
   so one of the structural issues is- what is the unit of measure for the
   sign itself. especially if it can be recontextualized. is the letter
   the unit, such that a [w|o|r|d] can be made particulate, atomized.
   perhaps, in part. though the examples above show that pronunciation or
   combinations or fusing or ambiguity or overlapping of cursive or script
   can blur this boundary as well, as if particle clouds and
   probabilities, or wave functions that can be temporarily established
   then collapse again into the surrounding ambiguity. so what if this
   could be expanded or unlocked, and the unit of measure could be intra-
   or infra- or inter-letter, or likewise -alphanumeric symbol or sign.
   that could recontextualize and provide different structuring, perhaps
   even overcoding or transcoding or paracoding texts in some way that
   allows multiple readings, possibilities, parallel perspectives.

   thus, a question of what a unit of the subtextual may be. and how this
   could relate to fonts and typography, functioning of keyboards as dumb
   peripherals where the existing assumptions and conventions lock-in a
   particular perspective that instead could be opened up- if someone is
   really willing to break all the rules, crack the code, etc. then
   language may not be delineated in the same parameters, as there could
   be 20 letters 'A' to choose from, etc. and their could be a range of
   meaning, especially when combined with other letters. and thus a new
   form of symbolic language could develop that is akin to code, in some
   sense. though this could go much further than a superficial reading of
   [signs] as fancified text, as if another font style, and involves
   access to structures of truth, different awareness, conceptualization,
   perspective. paradigm shiftkey.
   ⊺⧢s⟘ ⋋ëst t∈s⨁
   (another reference test for wordwrap) - 77 character monospaced Courier
   New font
   XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX
   XX XX

References

   1. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151655052466759
   2. http://music-mix.ew.com/2013/06/24/santigold-the-heat-soundtrack/
   3. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZoHSce004M
   4. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mIMMZQJ1H6E
   5. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HPSRqVXEQ4Y