On 2013-10-03 22:48, Lodewijk andré de la porte wrote:

   2013/10/3 Juan Garofalo <[1]juan.g71@gmail.com>

   --On Thursday, October 03, 2013 1:12 AM +0200 Lodewijk andré de la
   porte <[2]l@odewijk.nl> wrote:

     2013/10/2 Juan Garofalo <[3]juan.g71@gmail.com>
      I think you need to research the ABC of political theory before
     saying
     anything about anarchy. Your belief that anarchy is chaos is as
     unfounded
     as it is laughable.
     Anarchy as a word does not mean a thing.

   Right, it doesn't mean one thing, it means *two* different and mutually
   exclusive things. It is vulgarly used to mean 'chaos', and it's used by
   advocates of voluntary interactions to describe a social system based
   on voluntary interactions.

   This system fails in the sight of coercion by force. In fact coercion
   of any kind reduces the ideals i think you hold it to have.

   Anarcho capitalism, anarcho piratism, and feudalism are related
   systems.
   Any actually existent system tends to have elements of all three.
   Saga period iceland was primarily anarcho capitalist in icelanders
   relationships with each other, and primarily anarcho piratist in their
   relations with distant peoples.  They abducted a whole lot of women
   from Ireland.
   Feudalism with a King who is merely first among equals is anarcho
   capitalism in which those privileged to use force have established a
   cartel and local monopolies, but not a general monopoly.
   Anarcho piratism is anarcho capitalism where the number of people who
   are out of law with each other is alarmingly large.

References

   1. mailto:juan.g71@gmail.com
   2. mailto:l@odewijk.nl
   3. mailto:juan.g71@gmail.com