--- overview ---
   pile-on. the following are a wide range of examples of everyday
   situations that could have crypto relevance, in one way or another. the
   purpose is to share a view of how large the fundamental questions are,
   beyond a software/hardware and computer model to perhaps question the
   assumptions of where the boundaries are, especially as it is decided
   upon in a fixed set of [signs] via code and programs, versus what i
   propose is to deconstruct to the most minimal structures, circuits and
   models and hypotheses that become the code, in a diagrammatic pattern
   language versus linear sign-based system. thus more like molecular
   sculpture, programming,  in testing and evaluating ideas from the
   period table, via logical reasoning, than an issue of rationalization
   of a private finite bounded binaristically determined view that is
   detached from actual reality, separated from it, substituting for it.
   this is a problem of language and meaning and the limits of
   linearization both in terms of writing/reading though also
   computationally, in serial processing of, what amounts to a false
   singular perspective made up of fragments of relativism yet not
   rigorous enough to achieve grounded empiricism due to error reliance.
   thus, the gap in questioning and interpretation as it may relate to
   fields and ideas beyond the ordinary consideration. also: it is to
   assume cryptographers in their natural state may actually think in
   these terms (dimensionally) though it may not have a place in code as
   code or analogous encryption approaches due to a particular technical
   approach, if over-focussed on subjective mathematics and out of balance
   with the larger questioning of signs and their relation to reality,
   this as language based on logical reasoning, both mathematical and
   'cultural'. in the way crypto may reference books via hidden patterns,
   to decipher messages, it is presumed this is more the foundation of the
   discipline than flawed technology. and thus more a reminder of its
   depth and range of operation, than  finiteness.
   --- aesthetics ---
   the false perspective can be tricky, images deceive- who figures the
   effortless grace of a Cary Grant presidency would front for an illegal
   crypto dictatorship, another hidden order plotting against citizens
   behind the iconic, oversaturated stars and stripes of the US flag,
   emblem of patriotic ideology that all are safe, there is nothing to
   worry about, while people are actively being ground into dust.
   the image can lie. it can misrepresent. [signs] that are pattern
   matched can be subverted, appearing to be one thing while functioning
   as another. this is why testing hypotheses versus blind faith in
   theories is a required for vigilance. [sign.A] can transform into
   [sign.B] yet appear still as if the [sign] itself, unchanging, yet if
   the context or dynamics shift, its meaning and purpose can also. it is
   as if there is no awareness of what observation is, a pre-literate
   condition whereby populations are not educated enough to distinguish
   their or others ideas in a grounded framework. and critical to this is
   the concept of perspective, the physical relationships that establish
   viewpoints and boundaries.
   for instance, if a neighbor listens at the wall to monitor another
   person, who is simply typing at a computer and not making any
   disturbance that could effect them,  yet this neighbor knows what they
   are typing is 'wrong' and disturbing and could in turn retaliate to
   stop the activity. this also is an issue of perspective and boundaries,
   where the right of privacy of a tenant is disregarded by a neighbor who
   instead surveils and exploits this as a means of political harassment.
   a line or boundary has been crossed, the law disregarded, and this can
   also happen with government, if it too monitors and disallows legal
   activity that seeks to shut down activity it deems 'wrong' to its
   particular limited agenda and viewpoint, and in this way ignoring the
   constitutional rights of other citizens as the default.
   meaning of words and concepts and symbols demarcate 'the lines' or
   trajectories of logical reasoning, they need to be validated and
   error-corrected and watched over to maintain a proper relationship, yet
   if this oversight fails, an all-seeing perspective that is actually
   very limited and based in false and biased views can become 'the
   public' framework, yet function against this public via corruption of
   these same frameworks and processes needed to maintain a shared public
   state.
   The Republic by Plato describes various forms of government as one type
   leads to another and in this, democracy is said to lead to
   dictatorship. of various other forms of governance, say aristocracy or
   communism, it is proposed in a context of empirical truth, that if
   'truth' were the basis for governance of human citizens in a human
   state, that these various stages of governance could all function on
   the 'same side' of truth, even while configured differently. and if
   truth were the basis for relations, and its error correction, then
   perhaps these various forms of governance could error-correct known
   failures in these same systems. in this way it is hypothesized that the
   truth in European nations is not against truth in other areas, and the
   truth in Russia and truth in China is not inherently against or opposed
   to the truth in the US or Canada. and thus so too issues of crypto.
   in that, 'shared awareness' and 'shared truth' may have a different
   boundary than the nation-state and each state could function with
   'shared lies' as a challenge which is common across borders as well,
   and maps into another framework than the state is organized around in
   its traditional terms. thus doubling of function, potentially, inside
   and outside, to deal with these dynamics both near and far. it would
   seem that human identity is the basis for this assumption that such
   shared empirical observation could occur in a human framework, to
   resolve discrepancies occurring internally and externally and provide a
   means of accurate feedback in regards to shared principles and the
   ability to evaluate and correct errors in a common framework based in
   shared truth, tested and retested against the evidence.
   what is particularly of interest in this is the role of symbolism that
   spans all states of the world, especially in a realm of flags and other
   representations of a people or culture, potentially as signaling
   systems referencing common elements. for instance, colors or stars or
   birds, as these structural /signs/ may change country to country yet
   reference or communicate via similar symbolic elements.
   likewise, each country or region may relate in particular frameworks
   for cuisine and local customs, including clothing and zeitgeist, as
   modern and traditional influences may be mediated uniquely in a given
   context which can also heavily depend upon geography and connectivity,
   which can lead to routes unchanged over millennia, more closely
   connected to the ancient past than the unfolding future. and that there
   is truth everywhere and truth to be learned from these various people
   and perspectives about existence and the nature of being and
   perception. that perhaps they know things that are beyond another's
   limited boundary and thus listening and considering the ideas is an
   important process in human relations, as it relates to truth and
   evidence and what exists versus what is believed to exist. and that
   deep human connections are possible in opening up and allowing for this
   dialogue and evaluation of hypotheses in a shared framework based on
   and guided by truth itself. where each perspective counts in the truth
   it exists within. and that 'higher truth' as a principle must be
   accounted for likewise, fundamentally. that some truth is hierarchical
   and its structural capacity must be recognized and respected, versus
   deferring to lesser truth and less accurate interpretations. in this
   way, truth establishes actual power. its corruption weakens and dilutes
   it.
   it is something to consider then, when a national dish or symbolic
   [sign] are corrupted or subverted -- say the main ingredient in hotdish
   of a given culture is being poisoned somehow as part of a hidden
   agenda. or that an apple is so loaded with chemicals and various drugs
   as to be sickening, yet remains a symbol of health ('an apple a day
   keeps insurance and healthcare in perpetual play'). what if the
   kielbasa is spiked at the factory. or the water is loaded with
   unfiltered psychiatric run-off and windshield wiper fluid. or mothers
   breasts transit Zoloft to newborns. at what point of disjuncture may
   these dynamics be considered corrupt in their pre-existing
   interpretations and requiring of new evaluations to get at what has
   changed and what is going on behind the curtain of hidden, secret state
   and its antihuman agenda. how can an appearance remain unchecked which
   has been subverted so that it stands against itself as its own
   [anti-sign]. yet this a=b condition becomes an issue of allegiance and
   ideological alliance, as if litmus to separate the canaries into the
   psychiatric system while funneling the rest into the awaiting cattle
   chutes. silent, passive, easily controlled, compliant, ready to be led
   to their demise while helping the process along and getting paid for
   it.
   what are the security issues involved and secrecy required for such
   events to occur yet be off the cultural and communications radar. where
   is the feedback or critical evaluation in a larger human context,
   versus fragmented relativisms that focus here or there in
   specificities, yet cannot seem to make tangible a standing conspiracy
   to overtake the world and turn the earth into a slave prison-planet.
   in that sense of civilian world war, it is curious what individuals
   might think about in terms of the stakes involved, life and death
   scenarios as the situation becomes increasingly clear. what happens
   when people are set against one another in barbarian-like mindsets and
   pre-literate and illiterate frameworks. might not issues like tattoos
   become areas of populist contention, where those of differing natures
   seek to regain the meaning of their signs, no longer observing
   boundaries of respect for unlike others, whose tattoos by comparison
   may be their devaluing, or seek to signify what they really are not-
   and thus a stand-off could occur in such strange realms. or, those with
   piercings as a security issue, if say there is a sudden appearance of
   torturers in the population, against the opposition, where having
   battery hookups on various body parts is inviting such exploitations.
   would you walk around in a thunderstorm in a large field with a metal
   antenna strapped to your head? what about walking around with 'security
   exploits' in times of war, inviting the oppositional imagination to
   consider the worst, given the specifics.
   and so too, the increasing primativisation as a cultural trend, whereby
   ear plugs and flesh tubes seemingly emulate villagers of particular
   cultural traditions as if a style or extension of a fashion or
   aesthetic movement. the issue involved is also of a potential security
   exploit- what might someone do with that, against a person, as a
   weakness or if they relate to it as a threat of profanation of the
   shared values. and there is nothing to stop the stand-off between these
   people. i cannot help but think of college hazing gone wrong, where a
   U-Lock could easily capture a person against a pole via their earlobes
   and there could be no way of escape in a given scenario than ripping
   your own ears open and having flaps from the stretched condition. and
   yet- there are vast many people who despise these kinds of
   transgressions, in cultural terms, for signifying a devolving culture.
   what if such aesthetic choices are security choices. what if they could
   lead to other interactions eventually in a changing context, and the
   'shared awareness' is simply the result of an absence of
   error-correction for the group, and that such a group may have limits
   on some issues, which could align with certain principles.
   in that, it is highly likely many are in these contexts and require
   adaptation to cultural dynamics, and so may be self-aware about the
   deeper divisions this may involve in 'shared awareness' in terms of
   aesthetics, or as aesthetics divide groups and individuals from one
   another. as if a stage play and costumes for different characters and
   their roles. and that this must be acknowledged. and yet so too there
   could be ideology involved, beliefs that could be fundamentally false
   or wicked or antihuman even, associated with similar signage and
   associated or related practices, given the particular individuals and
   groups so aligned. and in this way, like a freeway sign or marker
   offering direction, these iconic [signs] and the observational
   processing of symbols establishes certain relations and is involved in
   establishing and maintaining specific limits, boundaries, and rites.
   the rock-opera film Quadrophenia is an interesting contrast between the
   aesthetics of mods on vespa scooters and leather-clad rockers on
   motorcycles in the UK 1960s. the contrast between the Beatles and the
   Rolling Stones likewise, in some way. it involves aesthetic
   communications and symbolic language of artifacts, actions, and ideas,
   cultural practices that can eventually run in parallel or even against
   one another, say if biker gangs go to war over territory. graffiti or
   [signs] can be part of this infrastructure of hidden communication that
   may otherwise be missed by those outside the shared boundary or
   framework of interrelational awareness.
   so an issue such as hairstyles, such as the mohawk from the punk era,
   versus in the present day, where it may be a different sign,
   potentially of conformance if the spirit of rebellion is only shallow,
   versus visceral challenging of order. and as language, how this may
   relate historically to earlier eras, peoples, and ideas. that there is
   depth to signs and symbolism, and thus literacy involves awareness and
   the ability and capacity to read and interpret these events in their
   depth, or to the depth available. and thus experience or knowledge can
   help in observation.
   in other words, there could be authentic signs and symbols, retaining
   an integrity and others that are mimicking this, emulating, or
   simulating the [signage] while potentially even standing against its
   depth, as an anti-sign, camouflage or label wearing, as status symbols
   or markers, these relations hollowed out of meaning and made
   superficial yet still potentially functioning and treated as if
   originals and not copies of copies which devolve via noise, and
   dissolve into greater falsity. what is a sign that only references
   itself? or self-aware self-referencing. what if to some extent it is a
   form of advertisement, marketing, instead of ideas it is about
   consumerism, for instance, replacing cultural depth with its
   commodification as a result of increasing development of illiteracy in
   a context of mass populism. such that the TV extra or stand-in or "bit
   part" becomes a kind of vocation, just like a person can decide to
   become a heroine user and make a living as an addict, because the
   clinics and programs need them to justify their own existence and thus
   a lifestyle can be sustained by various choices, say versus another
   line of work. such as focusing on human problems beyond the self and
   making huge sacrifices on behalf of the group, and taking beating after
   beating in doing so. maybe it is an issue of broken people again, yet
   at some point there is also a choice and again a boundary issue- a
   critical moment, and making the wrong choices distinguishes one group
   from another, and it is proposed The Moment of Truth is this
   demarcation.
   whose to say that if a government falls and functions in its worst
   vices against its own citizens, that those on the inside of its
   internal organization are also not the same group protected in corrupt
   society - such that surveillers and those going after people, setting
   them up or gathering evidence to take them down, are not themselves the
   pedophile networks and child abusers and misogynists who most benefit
   from this devolved condition, seemingly of a shared political agenda
   even. and so what if the [signs] are not accurate for what may actually
   be involved or the network of signs are not allowed to be established
   or referenced for shared navigation because this territory is already
   encrypted and under control, via these same hidden and hostile forces,
   operating beyond the existing boundaries. what if there is a plague or
   epidemic of moral collapse that is the rotten core of the rogue state
   and its antihuman agenda and that at its center is a concentrated
   network that is organized around principles against citizens,
   education, law, freedom, human development, family, marriage, nature,
   as part of a conspiracy. and yet this very situation could also have
   been devised as a trap, with a dual plan that both allows for this
   maldevelopment in order to annihilate it within society, and thus
   complex and contradictory cryptography also exists in this same
   context.
   --- further note on aesthetics ---
   regarding issues of individual style, the film Tinker Tailor Soldier
   Spy, released in the past few years, was an interesting evaluation of
   the dress of those whose business it is to operate in the realm of
   secrets and national security issues. it is almost that dress is occurs
   thoroughly at the midpoint range, in an ambiguous realm that is neither
   completely common nor singularly identifiably unique. and thus blending
   into a surrounding population, nondescript perhaps, not standing out as
   a benefit for those moving between realms amongst others of different
   domains.
   what is interesting is that there is value to camouflage yet also the
   potential for small details, that establish identity in a minimal or
   traditional framework than needing to establish this as extreme
   individualism or group activity, though that likely has its place
   equally so, given different context. though it would appear an issue
   connected with identity and shared or unshared awareness, if the focus
   is on maintaining costuming or being removed of its additional
   requirements. perhaps for some the tradeoff is necessary or critical,
   yet for others it could be that their anonymity is part of their
   security and safety protocol. as a [sign] they may become ambiguous and
   unnoticed in a particular context, in that their extreme sport is
   bloodsport and yet no one may be the wiser of such activity.
   another film, The Company (2007) with Michael Keaton as the head of a
   mole-hunting counterintelligence unit, an orchid lover known as
   "mother", conveys this symbolic dimension likewise in a larger symbolic
   framework that cultural communication inherently exists within, as the
   context for shared meaning via language. and thus if [signs] are
   mediated in this way as a way of conveying stories, why would they be
   limited in this same depth in a realm of computation involving such
   [signs], unless of course this is not the case and other approaches
   exist within crypto.
   this has been a futile attempt to reference the [signage] of self as
   signifying a certain algorithm reading by others, in a surrounding
   culture, as the boundary for shared or unshared awareness. it may be a
   haircut, a suit, color or style of clothing, shoes, tattoos or body
   piercings, though at some point these are patterns that are matched
   against others, such that a 'hacker' is represented by a particular
   style or school of thought, and defined aesthetically. or programmer,
   or covert operative, or cryptographer, or technocrat, or artist, or
   activist.
   and there seems to be a corrolaly here, potentially, between these same
   issues of superficial crypto where a BIG SIGN is put up saying: HERE IS
   THE HIDDEN SECRET!!! and so sometimes a style can develop that begins
   to represent a hacker, say, with stickers all over their laptop, and
   the ability to run scripts and vandalize and steal passwords, and yet
   they may be operating in a different realm from those of the 60s
   onward, who are part of a different language, and 'hacking' could have
   become a popular group activity, normalized, not radicalized in the
   same way, in that it is thoroughly profitable and aligned with policies
   of development say, and so the 'alternative may have become the
   mainstream' yet view itself as standing apart in some critical way,
   which is signified by ritual practices, conferences, clothing or
   hairstyles or music, etc. an anthropological study probably would be
   needed of the subculture versus a naive guess at what may be involved.
   excepting that 'popular signs' of hacking appear to coincide with
   existing politics, where exploitation of other citizens may be
   occurring by script kiddies and others who are benefiting from this
   societal breakdown, versus goals of a higher purpose that may remain in
   the underground, and those who are not craving to be up on stage.
   it is just that, a particular shallowness and hollowness to certain
   disciplines appears to exist - including with other realms such as
   architecture concerned with increasing heights of skyscrapers versus
   questioning, changing, or challenging city planning principles to
   address economic, social, or governance issues within building design -
   and yet in this superficiality, the [architect] is equated with those
   who before them did explore these dimensions and served higher
   principles that today seem absent in the development process, as if
   culture itself has been subverted, hacked, rooted, taken over and sent
   in another antihuman direction. and so someone may stand-in as an
   [architect] and look the iconic part, yet serve other principles and
   effectively function in masquerade, hiding another agenda.
   and so in a 'landscape of difference', of wildly diverging styles as if
   freedoms of people to be who they really are, conglomerate around
   computer monitors and there is a class of programmers who can
   manipulate computers and develop software and maintain systems -- and
   yet the gap is only widening at the same time these same types are
   playing foosball or raving with friends and eating expensive food,
   while operating in a realm potentially associated with 'hackers' or
   those who are standing-in for an idea that tended towards human
   liberation via technology, and not its confinement, whereby these same
   technologists in their lifestyles and their stylistic code of hair,
   jewelry, clothing, and tribal customs appear to actually represent the
   [anti-sign] of the previous hacking ethos in its larger purpose and
   calling. such as the potential of the internet, versus monetization. as
   if the very idea and imagination of this online context has collapsed
   into a trapdoor beneath center stage, where advertisement and marketing
   rule everything in a no-exist dungeon scenario, and these of simulated
   radicalism and emulated individualism are actually ~Garden of Earthly
   Delights minions, an occupying force that is developing an antihuman
   agenda via hardware and software as an unchecked business model, with
   no greater expectation of individuals in their capacity.
   so a [sign] can look like something or have appearance or claim to be
   equivalent to some defined meaning, and this may be pattern matched
   even -against itself-, and yet if it does not correlate or ground to a
   larger context of truth this same 'naming' could be superficial or
   subverted, and instead be [anti-sign] instead, whereby pseudo-truth
   moves to falsity in an unshared perspective, beyond the protected
   boundary where skew and distortion, bias and warping are unaccounted
   for and allow belief to function as truth, a bubbled interior realm,
   potentially that of unchecked egotism and narcissism in place of
   substance of the claimed signs. in this way, issues of language-- it
   confuses what the sign references with the sign (its attributes)
   itself, as if wearing the costume equates with the role, acting versus
   being. knowing versus pretending or mimicking to some extent or
   another. it is like comparing a programmer who knows 50 computer
   languages and has designed their own, versus someone who has done some
   C++ and can run malware scripts and do bug exploits, where both
   reference the same [sign], in a context of shared truth. and if this is
   unaccounted for, then a vast bubble culture may exist, which is then
   extended into code, as an illusion is sustained about the basic nature
   of things, technological, ideological, institutional, computational,
   philosophical, though most especially political. the power dynamics
   operating in these domains and the active high-voltage structural
   circuits relied upon for day-to-day operation of this exploitation,
   versus other parallel plans remaining hidden. the potential for the
   greater truth, discharging the covert super-capacitors in each
   discipline as the motherboard of state rewires and reprograms its
   territory.
   --- trading the paperclip ---
   an artifact can function as language. its relation to its context is
   important, as this establishes or changes meaning. an item can be
   placed in a museum and the way it is observed can be transformed, such
   as Duchamp and the Fountain urinal, signed by the artist, thus
   recontextualizing it, establishing a new context, meaning, way of
   relating and interpreting the artifact within new dimensionality.
   (reframing)
   a particular artifact i find especially interesting is the ACCO Ideal
   butterfly paper clamp, it is an innovative, functional, highly
   aesthetic style of paperclip that has always reminded me of electric
   transmission towers. those giant metal armatures crossing continental
   landscapes, carrying the AC powerlines that deliver high voltage power
   from its area of generation to its areas of consumption. in many ways
   representative of the federal level of the state in its civic quality.
   thus there is a potential transference of the icon of the transmission
   tower into the smaller scaled context of a similarity or likeness in a
   type of paperclip, which may or may not be recognized by an observer
   who readily uses the artifact.
   and this is to suggest that, like a business card or a calling card,
   such an artifact could function as a token in its symbolism, if valued,
   and also as [signage] that is recontextualized by its surroundings. in
   other words, it could function as a cryptographic key potentially, or
   shared key, or cipher system, depending on whether or not these
   encounters with 'networks of power' are noticed by an observer who can
   relate to their meaning, or who is bounded in awareness.
   in other words, the paperclip can have a kind of currency, both as a
   material object and "informationally" as a form or basis for data
   exchange, of ideas, as it relates to shared awareness or as a basis for
   communications. and this could and does occur already with other
   artifacts in the realm of symbolic communication that as a practice is
   perhaps best zoned in paracrypto relations, non-verbal, rich with
   meaning, adept in language, yet likely unnoticed by those outside its
   limits.
   so there is a famous instance of a paperclip as money, where a single
   paperclip is exchanged and the person eventually ends up with a 2-story
   farmhouse...
   One Red Paperclip
   [1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_red_paperclip
   this is not the same idea, though it gets at the current involved in
   transactions around a common object in terms of shared value and
   exchange. yet this can occur informationally, where the paperclip
   instead is a symbol or sign of language, and can establish
   communication and transmit ideas, potentially. and thus transfer data
   or awareness or provide insight. it is like a silver bullet placed at a
   crime scene as this relates to its perpetrator. or an assassin who puts
   pennies on the eyes of their victim. yet also not of this same deathly
   realm necessarily, it could instead belong to a realm of networking or
   connection between peoples or indicate certain parameters which may or
   may not be valid, given its source. so such an artifact could be used
   for communication and carry insight in its use and application, whereas
   a mimic or subverter may attempt the same yet it could be hollow or
   shallow or misleading, and in a sense, 'collapse the wave that carries
   the signal', thus indicating an ungrounded relation or compromised
   instance.
   in this way, the paperclip of ordinary design can represent this
   tradeability as language, by its use as exampled in the url above. and
   yet in another mundane environment it may be just like another penny on
   the ground, so infinitesimal that it is beyond notice, as if worthless
   and subconscious unless needed for use.
   and yet another style of paperclip, the butterfly paper clamp, has a
   symbolism that goes beyond itself as an icon and maps into another
   structure (electric transmissions pylons) and in some sense can
   represent these as language, and in a sense, symbolic currency even. in
   that to share the artifact could function both by itself as a symbol,
   though also in a context of surrounding environment that may function
   in and reference an embedded context, as a [sign] in relation to other
   [signs], and this is how sentences or more in-depth meaning can be
   formed beyond the singular event of 'the symbol' (pylon!) and into
   statements involving or extending its meaning, to some threshold of
   what is possible to communicate in an abstract realm, given surrounding
   structures and frameworks of an observer.
   in this way an errant paperclip or other symbol strangely located in a
   context could call attention to itself through its uniqueness or
   out-of-placeness, and in questioning its existence, strange or covert
   communication could take place in hidden channels of awareness, beyond
   the boundary of others. and in this way, who placed the paperclip or
   how it got there could remain a mystery, it could even involve a hidden
   hand with root access to establish such scenarios, and this can be a
   way that crypto-communciations occur in what can be a paranormal realm,
   as statistically unlikely events stack up one after another and
   establish an entire universe of non-verbal communication via symbols
   and signs, in precisely this way.
   there is magic involved, and this connectivity transcends the limits of
   computers and hardware and software devices and is primary in
   establishing human relations, and advancing shared awareness via
   referencing truth within empirical frameworks, using fundamental
   principles and concepts of language, via this hidden calculus.
   this is the same idea involved in transmuting the word 'cipher' into
   'cigar', it is of a similar process of the actualization of these
   concepts in the everyday environment as an artifact functions as a
   cryptographic key or message yet may remain unnoticed in these
   dimensions by others.
   it is proposed that this Strange Read/Reply Function (SRF) could be a
   way of annotating such extra-dimensionality via reinterpretation,
   misreading, errors, mistakes, misunderstandings, or other mutations of
   meaning that recontextualize yet expand or alter the original condition
   and perhaps provide additional insight or bring into question its
   meaning, via this dŽtournement. optimized plagiary or [recoding] or
   [overcoding] or a way of accessing subtext via another method of
   deconstruction. thus opening up interpretation of the text beyond the
   limit of its referenced [sign] to its potential or range of [signage],
   so to evaluate ideas and allow relations beyond the preconceived
   boundaries, to access hidden dimensions embedded within the deep
   structure of the code, its intersign armature. in this way at the
   intersection or juncture of architecture and archaeology, past and
   future meeting in the present. do observers relate, and in what
   structures, frameworks, dynamics. what is the potential, the boundary,
   the limit. how to access the greater truth of N-dimensionality, the
   nonlinear in linear context. and thus a conceptual tool to potentially
   reassign the sign to say more about it, as this may relate to sets and
   multisets as parallel, co-existing computations. perspectives or frames
   that potentially have a lot to offer traditional views, such that the
   ephemera and errata could be critical in establishing grounding where
   the assumptions of normative practices related to sign-based
   communication (as linear calculation) and correct interpretation may
   make it off limits, by default of being wrong or breaking rules of
   grammar and-or syntax, versus to acknowledge and allow the potential
   for meaning where it exists, unearthed.
   --- on randomness ---
   it has not adequately been conveyed that artists and artworks can be
   expert at this signaling and data exchange via symbolic communication.
   and this extends into the entire ecosystem of gallerists and museums
   and auctioning of paintings during critical periods, where for instance
   The Scream will suddenly dominate the global news cycle -- this becomes
   a form of widely distributed communication -- not only in terms of
   'selling the paperclip' and instead the other parallel aspect of using
   this artifact as a shared reference, a world line by which other
   dynamics may be aligned or effected by its force fields. including art
   heists likewise. or newly discovered painting, such as the recent Van
   Gogh painting of a pot farm.
   previously introduced to the ideas of John Cage regarding his use of
   the I Ching to generate randomness, i was unable to appreciate its
   value as a way to mediate questions of architecture instead of engaging
   social issues within design ideas. and i probably am still too limited
   to understand its actual relevance in that domain. and yet in a context
   of cryptography this same technique could seemingly allow another RNG
   approach and thus is mentioned here for those it may interest.
   composer John Cage - chance operations
   [2]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Cage#Chance
   similarly yet differently, in relation to this, graphic symbols could
   potentially also be used in a roulette approach for randomness,
   slot-machine littoral:
   symbols graphic search
   [3]http://www.symbols.com
   --- urls ---
   some additional content related to previous ideas...
   animal prints confusing zoo animals (a=b)
   [4]http://ca.news.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-buzz/uk-zoo-bans-animal-prints-
   because-confused-wildlife-153949434.html
   The Science of Stress, Orgasm and Creativity: How the Brain
   and the Vagina Conspire in Consciousness (human code)
   [5]http://www.brainpickings.org/index.php/2013/09/23/naomi-wolf-vagina/
   Naomi Wolf and Jim Pfaus talk sex // ^related
   [6]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Ttrb-97tFA
   The Phases of the Moon
   [7]http://www.pinterest.com/pin/178525572702339653/
   Plumage // note: politics and style
   (ref. symbol dictionary for more info)
   [8]http://www.mnartists.org/work.do?rid=339423
   ☷ ☶
   ☱ ☲

References

   1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_red_paperclip
   2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Cage#Chance
   3. http://www.symbols.com/
   4. http://ca.news.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-buzz/uk-zoo-bans-animal-prints-because-confused-wildlife-153949434.html
   5. http://www.brainpickings.org/index.php/2013/09/23/naomi-wolf-vagina/
   6. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Ttrb-97tFA
   7. http://www.pinterest.com/pin/178525572702339653/
   8. http://www.mnartists.org/work.do?rid=339423