On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 9:11 AM, John Young <[1]jya@pipeline.com>
   wrote:

   Is this conclusion still valid? If so, what could be done to restrict
   traffic
   volume to assure unbreakablility? And how to sufficiently test that.
   Presuming that NSA and cohorts have investigated this effect.


    no- not for a multilinear/nonlinear bit set approach. voluminous data
   exchange
    and not censoring throughput (given ability to correlate elsewhere,
   delayed
    or real-time; thus store+forward)  and allowing inaccurate modeling of
   data
    via ideological rationalizations turns that limited analysis back
   against itself
    as truth is secure, folding the framework via collapsing pseudo-truth
   and falsity,
    recontextualizing the shared situation, establishing new zones of
   interaction
    and unmapped boundaries that do not coherently correlate within
   existing
    models of analysis, instead breaking them. versus propping them up via
    following their rules and dictates that seek to limit and censor
   interactions
    as a basis for secrets or sustaining false-perspectives, seemingly
   often for
    self-preservation of legacy systems versus allowing collapse,
   deterioration
    or loss of control over what occurs- freedom in relation to governance
   versus
    its constriction, choking what can happen, to keep it finite, bound,
   gagged

    hypothetical, the massive influx of data (in truth) that is wrongly
   assessed
    (as pT) via limited observer established zone of secure interaction by
   default
    of its own false framework and incapacity to account for what does not
   exist
    in its categorization- any move toward accommodation is ideological
   weakness
    and falsifies belief system. it is to overwhelm with data that cannot
   be grounded
    in the false framework and its ungrounded evaluation undermines the
   existing
    inaccurate view because it yields less and less in the limited
   perspective.
    flooding the corrupt oversight with what amounts to pseudo-truth,
   allowing
    any and all correlations to fever circuits- it breaks the
   rationalization model
    by forcing decision-making that tends towards falsity, as it is
   ungrounded
    and the more it decides, the more it persists and expands itself in
   error.
    transparency in truth, a shared domain, remains a secret and a secure
    realm insofar as it cannot be accessed, perceived, or altered in the
    dimensions it exists- seemingly only censored, stopped, or attacked
    which forces polarization, ramps up potential dynamics, and creates
    conditions for extreme actions that can force or break hidden systems
    via operating beyond their known boundary or losing stealth advantage
    in some ways it may be like reverse radar, what they see is the entire
    radar field as the signal, potentially, unable to distinguish its
   value or
    meaning or interpret what is happening in vast many different frames
    simultaneously, keying in and out, leading to massa confusa...
    (perhaps equivalent to big bang inflation of a paralleled universe)
    ♃ ♃

References

   1. mailto:jya@pipeline.com