--- continued... ---
   so maybe nothing is this simple, the previous statements and hypothesis
   themselves by default ungrounded, unrelated to the complexity involved
   in the existing context for social relations.
   what if the control of 'sexual code' and its programming via
   advertisement and industries is what formats consciousness and social
   relations and thus establishes the false 'common value' which is based
   on pseudo-truth and in that inaccuracy, the exploits can occur which
   turn a situation against itself by these very dynamics, if not via
   signs that represent them.
   for instance, if every female model walking down a global catwalk
   starts resembling Mick Jagger, you gotta wonder if the fake god is a
   narcissist who cannot get enough of their own image, even in an
   opposite sex form. and what that does to male-female dynamic relations
   likewise, whose ideal mate is really this, or is it precisely the
   vulgarity it involves the corruption itself, the information warfare
   and psychological ops against humanity.
   for instance, how do you know the object of desire is not a man dressed
   up or sex-changed into a woman, and what if paired keys does not
   address this or there is deception going on, where female appearance is
   camouflage to exploit those with natural desires, turning this
   connection of potential love into one subverted by hate, using love
   against a person as their weakness. and what if this covert, hostile
   agenda is normalized instead. and thus even a woman-hating male psyche
   could be representing if not also standing in for women, via simulation
   or substitution, for social relation.
   how do you know the difference between the patterns, how to verify and
   validate and secure a connection in truth, versus relying on
   pseudo-truth and ultimately what could be lies, then allowing the
   exploit the access it needs to corrupt and takeover systems. perhaps
   most especially in terms of blackmail or setting up a person for a
   takedown via these methods.
   it is proposed that the deceptions in those domain rely upon lies and
   structures of falsehood, and 'iconic' expectations such that, like
   modular code and programming, can provide predictable behaviors to
   exploit as if based on rulesets that can program step by step the
   interaction according to a preordained pattern. and that as long as
   truth is secondary to this, whether via money or shared ideology or
   bias, that in that zone these other activities could be masked or
   hidden as an agenda, opaque, in waiting.
   whereas in grounded truth and intimate connection, truth is the
   transparent shared condition of being, honest and error-correcting and
   forms the basis for trust between people, not some other framework.
   perhaps the only way to know would be a genuine connection in love,
   removed of illusion, and from here to proceed- anything else could be
   an illusion, about images, and in this way mirages in the desert of
   unshared reality, tricksters all around.
   love as grounding for intimate social relations and beyond, as it
   relates with fundamental and foundation truth, as it establishes solid
   relations between people and within society via shared empirical
   agenda. one, many.
   versus its subversion, mimicking of love, exploiting it, to serve some
   other end or hidden agenda, and thus false confirmations and shared
   lies that enable alternate worlds of deception which can occupy houses,
   entire neighborhoods and cities and states via networks, and beyond, to
   which a person may find themselves someday lost, every direction
   misinformation, every sign post a false indication, leading further and
   further into doom.
   thus the assumption of physical connection and the terror of its
   subversion may create a gap between the shared mind and awareness, and
   the physical relation with another, even though cryptic communication
   could occur. and thus asynchronous relations could exist in their
   place, as if each person is on the other side of a boundary that cannot
   be surpassed without losing the connection, because it cannot be
   sustained in the given environment. and yet entanglement could be
   present in this sharing of truth, especially in that erotic charge
   where worlds align, and in this, the same issue of keys and secure
   connection though in a realm of shared memory instead, as the intimate
   relation, and thus grounding could occur by validating this and
   securing it as a shared truth, in the realm of atmosphere it occupies.
   archetypes, jungian psychology, transference of S -> S' and S' -> S'. a
   woman walks around with her luscious shoes and wet gleaming nail polish
   until another turns a corner and becomes transfixed at the beauty, the
   circuit completed, switches turned on in the shared erotic connection
   and the alter finds its devote worshipper who receives this extreme
   pleasure.
   the economics of lust and love, these forms of hidden exchange, full of
   meaning and insight into the prime motivation that moves the world in
   its health and through its dysfunction, sickness. a terror to not have
   these dynamics liberated while the ugliness and grotesque can do
   anything while those so devoted are trapped and confined by rules and
   regulations as if natural instinct and affections area illegal, while
   regressions, sadism and misogyny are normalized. impossible for healthy
   balanced sexual dynamics when they are not allowed for humans,
   including the full range connections. instead all of this is
   middle-managed, bureaucratized and exploited by an instilled set of
   beliefs, at least on the outside, in the world of images.
   it is as if there are components of a circuitboard that are made to
   work with one another, that have collaborative and beneficial dynamics
   yet are not allowed in proximity to one another based on the components
   that are by comparison rigged, cheating and taking over the space and
   rewiring it only for their kinds, leaving areas of isolation and
   malfunctioning due to the inability to access the other, beyond the
   structural frameworks that seek to subvert and exploit the connection
   due to a corruption of its truth. what is unshared or partly true must
   be adapted to in order to survive. and then only to find later on what
   is missing, where it is located, and the distance between that may only
   be temporarily bridged in passing, via a quick glimpse of recognition
   of what has been lost in the everyday. and this can be the truth of
   love itself, intimacy, grounded connections.
   as with a simulation that seeks to replicate another situation, the
   fakery can be revealed in its errors, where resolution or detail is
   lacking and thus whether via inadequate computation or malmodeling, the
   framework based on and supporting this falsity may begin to warp and
   skew, potentially to cause accidents and crashes as its compass does
   not align with the larger circumstance of shared awareness that it
   seeks to control and to replace. so too with fake men and women,
   shallow and without depth of imagination, of limited and rigid
   reasoning, and while 'saying all the right things' it is these 'ideas'
   that have already and must always have been said before, as if
   referencing a memory database for fake-insight, correct perspective.
   again the binary viewpoint is ideal for such a simulative social
   substitute whereas a paradoxical situation would throw loop after loop
   into basic functioning and become a turing test to figure out to what
   degree the internal mechanism can actually calculate something beyond
   its boundary or threshold of interpretation. thus pregnant pause one
   thing, silence another as the system reboots and tries to brute force
   the situation again and again, as if something would be different by
   merely repeating the trials, trying to look for an error to exploit to
   retain old existing worldview as shared reality, albeit ungrounded and
   based upon deception, cloak dagger.
   the alchemy of relations, natural with natural, artificial with
   artificial, and virtual with virtual; yet in their recombination the
   dynamic exchange of natural with artificial, or natural with virtual,
   either tending toward the cyborg and in their composite, perhaps
   something akin to an advanced humanity yet removed of the human and
   grounded truth as the central value, the antihuman which seeks to
   destroy and replace the nature at its heart.

   typologies and permutations, chemical models and their transformations
   and relations within a geometric context -- not only in terms of being,
   and thus identity -- ideas themselves: models, hypotheses, awareness.
   in this way, understanding such cryptic code and programming can result
   in capturing pieces, turning positions and players via seeding truth
   and threshold access, putting the labyrinth on autopilot via these
   dynamics.
   it is thus in symbolic communication that observation often occurs and
   in awareness of self and others in this context, within existing or
   potential dimensions. and yet to also perhaps be ungrounded, illiterate
   in this same way as to how the observations are generated, validated,
   achieving 'truth' or does it begin as a fiction until removed of all
   accompanying errors...
   again to language and signs, the ecological relation amongst things,
   the associational structures inherent in perception whether or not
   conscious of them. to see a sign above a store with stalks of wheat,
   indicating bread. or grapes, wine. green grapes, white wine, red grapes
   red wine and so on, to whatever level of detail. infrastructural
   signage. bees as they relate to flowers and pollination, as this
   relates to honey. ideas, concepts, dynamics involved in these
   structural interrelations. massive code as it were, societies
   envisioned structured around the bee, for instance, by analogy.
   spiritual significance. deep knowledge of nature and industry, as
   systems relate and exchange their shared truth.
   and so too, in the more profane and superficial realm, viagra and an
   male male virility and breast implants and signs of hyper-feminine
   nurturing and the ecosystems of advertising, mass media entertainment,
   and social relations based on what becomes a structural pseudo-truth,
   as if mimicry, by which to 'shared consciousness' which can be a false
   perspective and unsustainable except as artifice, which then is further
   developed and built upon as if normal and solid when instead it is not
   of this same nature or instinct. it has different parameters of
   interaction, including detached sign-based relations where
   error-correction may be ignored and create a realm of ideological
   commerce detached from its physical reality, where womens breasts
   become detached from the sex itself via imposters or female substitutes
   which stand-in as representers or signs of female being yet seek to
   subvert the feminine by doing so, that depth of evil hacking, as it
   also relates breast cancer or other defacements, cutting and scarring
   of the body and its replacement via another plastic aesthetic, barbie
   doll, yet potentially Edward in drag, giving come hither looks on the
   street.
   the point is that -belief is not truth-. yet it can function as this if
   not aware of what is being perceived, having an understanding of the
   idea and a way of evaluating its integrity. can the belief even be
   questioned- or is it beyond the boundary of interpretation. and if so,
   what might it mean if a world of children is released into a world of
   masquerade, and the basic relations between boys and girls are forged
   in a world of imposters and exploiters who seek to destroy these very
   connections via their subversion. or short-circuit development of
   individuals and their relations via abuse that makes it certain they
   cannot function in these dynamics, healthily. what if that code is
   important too, for security in the state, protecting shared value, yet
   exists outside of software and hardware systems today, or rather- is
   enabling these types of exchanges via an ideological fortress built of
   binary religion and schemes that ride alongside the deception,
   providing tools and carrying water and making change at the sideshows.
   what if this is the same context for mass surveillance and these are
   also 'the politics' on the inside, mapping to the same corruption that
   becomes oppression of ordinary citizens.
   (cf. false perspective in relation to false economy via pseudo-truth,
   false reality sustained by maintaining status quo; code as facade.)
   what if the government spying of the public is being used to secure a
   private ideology as a perpetual, unchecked, governing power via corrupt
   language with no accounting for truth in its onesided reasoning.
   that is, it is deemed "legal" within a warped and skewed constitution
   and is essentially BAD FAITH, functioning against citizens, its subtext
   political domination and removing of enemies via guiding to cattle
   chutes.
   the programmatic aspect of this- you say certain things and they, like
   code words automatically trigger certain dynamics, as if via mechanism.
   and thus the [sign] of something, merely referencing 'the constitution'
   by someone who is a 'constitutional lawyer' could be viewed legitimate
   because what they declare cannot be overpowered by another
   interpretation in binary terms, yet similarly *ignores* all contrary
   and falsifying facts via ideology, and therefore relies upon, adds and
   extends errors into the shared state framework (like bugs and malicious
   code) that can be further exploited by subsequent policy actions -- yet
   which are never held to account in an empirical framework of shared
   truth - beyond language (!) meaning that the [signs], words and letters
   equate with this grounded truth instead of the ones and zeros of truth
   and falsity via logical reasoning, whereby acts of state become acts of
   literature, via private interpretation said to be and validated as 'the
   reading' though based upon these flaws that, in this A=B subjectivity,
   deteriorate the state in its functioning due to the loss of accurate
   grounding and accountability in truth, of and as truth, and instead
   only and increasingly partial, serving fewer and fewer. it is not that
   someone cannot propose ideas, it is that there is no error-correction
   mechanism to stop false perspectives from taking over the
   interpretation and thus an imbalanced framework, a corrupted code
   results. and mass surveillance contrary to privacy and businesses,
   franchises and supermarkets and shoe stores surveilling citizens is a
   vast obscenity to the laws of the shared state-- and yet a certain
   empowered population likewise seems to believe this is their right and
   proper managerial place, providing oversight of others, and thus
   tangibly 'represents their will' to promote and succeed in such an
   agenda.
   beneath this is the problem of reasoning in binary terms, as if a
   fencing competition, points scored and one side is victorious. or
   jousting match, someone brutally dismounted from their vehicle if not
   impaled. thus fear of losing and losing face, in binary terms.
   versus the greatness of ideas, of truth and concepts and modeling, the
   activity of considering things and sharing discoveries and knowledge
   and how terrible it has become in an age of universalized communication
   tools, the limit becoming ourselves, our limits and lack of imagination
   and the ability to think beyond flawed approaches while stuck in serial
   (binary) language. perhaps most notable is the role of theory, both in
   negative consequences yet also the metaphysical and tacit knowledge
   developed in tentative frameworks of interpretation that could and
   should be salvaged and brought into common empirical error-corrected
   realms, for what is true of what is theorized remains true, yet should
   not be reliant on falsity or errored-structures to maintain the
   hypotheses. because the gap between pT and T, and pT and F is the realm
   of the exploit, the subversion, which can change the stated direction
   of inquiry via its effects, whether knowingly by subversion or
   accident, hijacked by other unaccounted hidden forces.
   (note: it is this realm of partial truth or pseudo-truth that is the
   realm of paradox. essentially up until now it has been referenced as an
   inaccuracy, whereby A=B is considered false, due to limits of
   explanation in email format- more likely it would be said B=B equals
   not-A and thus would be false, though perhaps this should occur beyond
   a,b notation and just use t,f, such that T=F is the paradoxical
   condition, whereby what is true about it (T) would need to separated
   from what is false (F) within a realm of pseudo-truth, such that:
      1 <--- T --- (pT) --- F ---> 0
   and in doing this via a perpetual looping testing of the hypothesis,
   remove falsity and error from pseudo-truth, distilling the truth to
   only what is true (1) so that what remains of pseudo-truth is as near
   absolute as possible (towards 100% true, or 1 in probabalistic terms).
   in this way, a minor truth embedded in falsity that exists as
   ungrounded pseudo-truth, say a tiny fragment of truth to recover from
   an inaccurate error reliant perspective (1% or .01) could by this
   process be isolated and purified, moving towards 100% or 1 (T). thus
   the issue of paradox exists in an A=B or T=F scenario though removes
   the known falsity from the modeling, such that:
      (1)  A <--- pT ----> B (0)           therefore:   (~1 <-- .01)    T
   <== pT
   ...in terms of addressing and resolving paradox via hypotheses and
   testing models and concepts via multiple observers and shared empirical
   observations of the common event from as many angles as available.
      A = A  (tending towards truth)
      A ≅ B  (tending toward paradox)
      A = B  (tending towards falsity)
   or so it is proposed there is a nuanced delineation required that has
   been missing in previous explanation about the ambiguity involved.)
   ideas are like molecules, having edges and vertices and yet this is a
   nonlinear approach requiring to some degree a computational context for
   such 'conceptual language' to exist within, beyond the alphabetic as a
   means to communicate, outside the book, into the circuit and diagram
   and empirical model. panoptics central, many observers of a given event
   and tallying and error correcting the shared view, removing falsity and
   thus distortion and arriving at structures and scaffolding within and
   between concepts. truth at its core, logic as the basis for reasoned
   connections, and then referencing this model from any point and
   perspective and moving through it and making various interconnections
   as a way of conveying ideas, truth, perception, experience. school
   children to grandparents referencing the same modeling, developing and
   refining it over a lifetime.
   the same idea in part as hypertext^1, in this way such point-line-plane
   constellations of data could be mapped into its multidimensional
   structure and a single common instance of a concept referenced by all
   documents, such that [crypto] links to the concept, error-corrected,
   hypothesis challenged model of crypto maintained by tens of thousands
   of people and debated, in its entirety, as to its integrity and
   validity in terms of grounded truth, where every truth must be
   accounted for, via probabilistic looping of data and new data that
   remains contingent, able to be falsified, error-checked and corrected
   as part of the process of logical reasoning / programming.
   it would then be possible to develop a periodic table of 'ideas',
   models and concepts that are /forms/ that are aligned and grounded in
   the shared awareness of empirical truth and thus as code, and can be
   used for debate. not a negative interaction of win-lose, instead the
   intellectual challenge and joy of sharing views and observations and
   working-through differences and learning from one another and
   incorporating what is true within a model of shared truth and verifying
   and refining it as part of this 'reasoning' that has been lost to
   private relativistic dialogue in binary terms. in this way, all ideas,
   my own completely error-ridden and yet like others, whatever is true in
   them would survive the edits in shared evaluation as 'truth' and not
   just a private observation that functions only as fiction. whereas what
   is false would be removed, and what is partially true would need to be
   separated into what is true and what is unknown and what is false, and
   thus the room for potential hypotheses and further evidence, and also
   for the richness in previous outdated modeling that may correlate with
   an ecosystem of discovery, providing indications of a process involved
   that moves from earliest stages to refinement of these conceptual
   models. again, literacy is required, the ability to think and be aware
   and communicate and relate in a shared framework, as human observers.
   (basically modeling ideas as circuits, formed into molecules.
   individuals as circuits, tasks and routines for a new model of personal
   computing based on an AI data furnace approach)
   ---
   random notes: voting through digital money, taxes for representation,
   steering and percentage weighting towards certain policy priorities
   and-or approaches, say funding basic and applied research. also:
   greatest threat to tax system is subversion of policy  which justifies
   rebellion against taxes to fund private state oppression of public,
   financing own holocaust.
   work as info/value, correlated to money/currency via data model.
   accounting for work in a realm of symbolic processing, versus manual
   labor standard.
   issue of observing and accounting for crypto state viewed as treasonous
   by the binary ideologues, revealing deception of traitors, moles, liars
   and deceivers. becomes basis for criminalizing citizens as if
   perpetrators, use of surveillance blackmail in this context, free
   speech and expression the means to justify further police state tactics
   to protect those on inside and in administrative and managerial roles.
   social hierarchy involved and protected or secured bureaucratic
   structures these activities occur within.
   ---
   ^1 Project Xanadu by Ted Nelson
   [1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Xanadu
   Computers for Cynics 0 - The Myth of Technology
   [2]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdnGPQaICjk
   Computers for Cynics 1 - The Nightmare of Files and Directories
   [3]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qfai5reVrck
   Computers for Cynics 2 - It All Went Wrong at Xerox PARC
   [4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6SUOeAqOjU
   Computers for Cynics 3 - The Database Mess
   [5]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhzD2FKEEds
   Computers for Cynics 4 - The Dance of Apple and Microsoft
   [6]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xL19f48m9U
   Computers for Cynics 5 - Hyperhistory
   [7]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9PmIkAYhI0
   Computers for Cynics 6 - The Real Story of the World Wide Web
   [8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gWDPhEvKuRY
   Computers for Cynics N - CLOSURE: Pay Attention to the Man Behind the
   Curtain
   [9]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w950GgRzbJk
   ⚓

References

   1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Xanadu
   2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdnGPQaICjk
   3. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qfai5reVrck
   4. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6SUOeAqOjU
   5. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhzD2FKEEds
   6. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xL19f48m9U
   7. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9PmIkAYhI0
   8. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gWDPhEvKuRY
   9. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w950GgRzbJk