// apologies- yet another attempt at error correction of a previous
   statement and clarification.
   quote: Subvert logical reasoning, disallow it, including freedom of
   speech and thinking and censoring and controlling what facts are
   allowed - controlling POV - then the opposite occurs:  A|B ---> B, such
   that  T => pT
   This is the code exploit of the Binary Crypto Regime, where B(0)=A and
   pT(0)>T(1)
   --- clarification on computational approach ---
   I made an error in description of processing in the context of
   infinities, stating one infinity to the next is evaluated as if a
   serial approach when instead this would be nonlinear and require
   massively parallel processing, along with serial evaluations in a
   looping evaluative heuristic - testing against a hypothesis or model,
   'running code' or living code' as it were, versus a static one-time
   interaction of data and algorithms, instead more like a situation of
   intelligent life in a bounded context as if data aquarium or code
   planetarium.
   the reason for this parallelization relates to considering all the
   combined permutations in terms of probabilities, and thus [x][y][z] as
   variables are not necessarily, seemingly, about an algorithm that
   reveals a structure that helps move from x->y->z by some mathematical
   structure, or so that is my naive guess, such that if you use
   conventional crypto approach #1 something may be revealed between these
   that matches an equation pattern, provides order within the chaos of
   variability, until legible, intelligible.*
   In other words, instead of XYZ being a serial number that could extend
   linearly onward toward infinity, that is: [xyz] ...[∞], and that
   "string" is a horizontal number or code, that can in particular be
   related perhaps to binary on-off processing in a highly efficient
   manner, processing and computational speed and largest prime numbers as
   context-- instead, the assumption for this same situation in another
   crypto framework is that it could be happening 'vertically' like a slot
   machine that runs to bounded infinities (largest primes or not), within
   each variable, and thus [xyz] may not have a discernible linear
   structure or overall equation that makes sense of the resulting
   'horizontal' string. such that:
      [x][y][z] => [n¹][n²][n³]...[nⁿ]
   whereby [n] is variable and could be anything- a number, a function, a
   calculation, null, its own computation. And in this way, each variable
   could tend towards infinity or its own structuring, within the string,
   whose length is not so much the issue as the difficulty in resolving
   its total structure, especially linearly, such that [n¹²³] would not be
   decipherable running algorithms across its horizontal string and
   instead solving for each variable or say grouped variables in the
   string, eg. [n¹][n²⁻³][n⁴⁻⁹]
   Thus, while i have no actual idea of how crypto and binary code relate
   in terms of encryption methods and decryption, it is assumed this
   approach remains serial and directly interrogates the serial string to
   reveal its structure, across various formats of the code (various
   programming, encoding and other data formatting schemes). Thus, a
   binary string would be an example, 10100011001010001010101010010101,
   whereby to solve for [xyz...n] would involve finding the overall linear
   structure that provides for such linear organization, say assuming it
   is encrypted code *)S)*S*))SA&*S&**S()S*S)aAUIHNL*0, and therefore the
   assumption would remain that each variable is related to the next in
   some 'coherence' and solving one part or layer may reveal another, such
   as HSKSLLILHSILALSWLWLSDUI and thus the string [xyz] is made
   intelligible by this coherence within the linear string, across that
   massive horizontality (very large streams of data that contain data and
   programs and messaging).
   Whereas for a paradoxical logic approach, each variable could itself be
   'many' in place of a single bit- or the boundary of the single bit
   could be [N] and move towards a bounded infinity, a mathematical
   function, or other calculation in that same location.
   disclaimer, stating the obvious, i have no idea what this is in terms
   of applied cryptography, there is tremendous gap between these
   statements and actual code, though to me the approach is much more
   accurate as "thinking code" that involves human processing via logical
   reasoning, parallel and serial processing, and thus the very idea of a
   string of code in that view could also function as signal in noise or
   even absolute truth, in terms of messaging. and so it is obvious
   'binary thinking' is not like everyday evaluation in the sense that
   there is grey-area to mediating events, a pause to decision- yet within
   this pause, bounded infinities of hypotheses can be queried
   (referencing previous instances in stored or external memories) that
   then influence the tallying of the response, which most likely will be
   weighted between 1 and 0, unless purely ideological.
   Thus- *conceptually*- to consider "code" in this human context, of a
   living breathing idea that is grounded in empirical truth in a shared
   human viewpoint, that is to be shared as information, via exchange, it
   is more grayscale than 10110101010100001, in terms of language and how
   thinking functions, more about looping and weighting of variables than
   having a *single correct result* when there can be several overlapping
   or contrasting interpretations *at the same time*. So imagine if the
   binary string had each bit that was variable instead in a 0-9 scale of
   weighting the evaluation, such that 10927238292340246.
   This moves the [binary] string into a fragmented string of variables,
   more like analog computation [1][0][9]...[6]. In this way it is to
   consider the 'bit' as N-variable, and thus what if it were the alphabet
   instead of numbers: 26 letters possible for each bit: USOWHLSELNSQAHBVY
   the issue being that like a slot machine, those [N] variable bits could
   tally up any potential letter of 26, or +10 numbers with alphanumerics,
   or add lower case and punctuation or symbols and suddenly a small
   'string' of data could involve huge interrelational structures that may
   or may not be related across the horizontal span, depending on how it
   is constructed via algorithms and conceptual formatting. Maybe this
   already is the way transformed code is achieved with taking a certain
   sized content- variable [x], and then transmuting its entirety into a
   string or stream of obfuscated data that must be 'worked at' to decrypt
   or be translated to make use of.
   The seeming difference would be computationally, how this relation
   exists in processing, in terms of hardware and software, though also
   thinking, programming. Because what if there is a limit to these
   transmutations that is forced into a binary 1/0 and thus bounds these
   infinities to only certain algorithmic space, or even computationally,
   that such numbers cannot be adequately computed and thus *do not exist*
   as calculations within machines and software approaches, crypto perhaps
   especially, when the security they would provide would be unfathomable
   in terms of existing brute force calculations of 'linear' patterns.
   my speculation is of an unknowing of applied cryptography and computer
   programming yet knowing of logical reasoning and empirical thinking,
   awareness, and how the two are ideologically at odds in approach in
   terms of basic assumptions. thus within my condition of 'illiteracy'
   there is an attempt to share an idea (pT) about a shared situation from
   an outsider vantage, with those of highest literacy of applied code,
   yet within what to my observation is a flawed idea and based on false
   and inaccurate assumptions, in particular the primacy of binarism for
   security when this nonlinear/multilinear computation (parallel &
   serial) would easily defeat it.
   such that it is not about strings and instead parallel sets:
   [x|x|x|x]...[n]
   as the [variable] yet this may not be coherent in a horizontal
   algorithm to solve, it may not have 'rationality' across, from one
   digit to the next, revealing its hidden structure. instead, randomness
   would be inherent instead of woven into the code, it would be more
   revealing information out of noise structures than putting information
   into noise that is bounded and can be shaped into structure. in this
   way also, noise could have structure yet not lead to decryption, it may
   be a false corridor within the ever expanding maze.
   it is that [N] variables each are in superposition, not static by
   default, finite and absolute, and instead 'truly variable', unbounded
   to a certain extent (infinities within infinities across infinities via
   nested sets).
   the conceit or test of the heresy would be 256 'bit' quantum computer
   that solves 256 AES, though if it were a binary string this could even
   be trivial, versus say [N]-bit, which seemingly could take *forever* to
   evaluate, via running, looping code evaluation and a shared empirical
   model that develops alongside, out of and through the technology as a
   'thinking machine'-- which, the more it is like the human brain, the
   more likely the messaging could be made sensible via existing concepts
   and structures to test against, evaluating patterns and looking for
   correlations. in that context, a three bit [N]-variable string of code
   could probably defeat all computing power today, especially if large
   expanses were allowed, numbers, letters, symbols-- it would be
   unsolvable potentially, extremely probable. Largest primes would be a
   minor detail, another variable seemingly in such a context, due to its
   potential for incoherence and complexity.
   likewise, this [N]-bit approach for random number generators, yet why
   not random outside of 1/0 as a noise field, generating strings via a
   two [N]-variable string, just let it run and tap that, without or
   without structure, would it even matter. in other words: take any two
   ideas, any two signs or symbols or colors or whatever, and relate them
   and tally and extend this as a process. that is proto-language in a
   nutshell, this the crazy nut cracked open yet beyond the insanity of my
   own incapacity to communicate and flaws in understanding-- there is
   something about this approach and basically observation that has
   *coherence* that is absent in a binary approach and serial algorithms--
   because that is not how people think or communicate, it is
   N-dimensional, geometrical, looping. and processors and code and
   software at present cannot model this, allow for it. and that formats
   reasoning, perception, what options are available to share ideas and
   evaluate them, and we are stuck in binary because it is enshrined both
   in technology though also in institutions-- it is the dead static code
   of shared ideological non-thinking that is pushing decision-making and
   actions towards its deterministic end game, which is a onesided
   machine-based value system, devoid of life, nature, and humanity,
   except insofar as it profits its own continuing automated development
   and further extension.
   so the gap between my illiterate views and the actuality of implemented
   security code by those literate is one aspect, though another is my
   literacy in thinking code and the illiteracy of thinking within
   foundational technology, its infrastructure, and the result of this,
   which requires a world like it is, and relies on bad code and ideas to
   allow for it. thus an audit or accounting of the situation, an attempt
   to get across the idea that there is a model of dumb, unintelligent
   code at the base of this situation, the approach is so flawed as to be
   the basis for tyranny, and it ties into 'ideology' across platforms,
   individuals and groups of people to software/hardware and bureaucratic
   systems, and in that 'combined state' of a false-perspective empire,
   the kernel is corrupt and the whole thing invalid, including at the
   constitutional level which itself is ignored, by binary default, the
   epic loophole of relativistic frameworks allowing the fiction and its
   virtuality to replace shared logical reasoning, because truth and logic
   can simply be ignored, 'privatized'. and enclaves can rule over others
   as if a caste-system via technology and ideological assumptions that
   function as religion, technologists as priests, gods of this
   technocratic utopia, the peasants not having the understanding to
   operate in such a realm, as guaranteed by the originating lie and
   tradeoff that allows for all of this to continue. that absolute truth
   is an everyday condition and you get to choose what to believe as if a
   right or protected mode of operation, no matter how many others must
   suffer for it, to sustain the illusion and shared delusion.
   the cloud here in the corrupted model a state filing cabinet, digital
   bureau for the bureaucracy, citizens organizing info into others
   invisible folder structures, volunteering the data via handover,
   designed into the technology itself as a marketing and communications
   strategy. the sieve of private data is equivalent to entire populations
   seeking out pickpockets to hand over their contents, incentivized as it
   is. and so 'security' is as if a kind of institutional transparency in
   relation to a corrupted, failed, rogue state that can read and see
   everything you are doing, whether or not encrypted, dumb terminals
   every computer to the state mainframe, rebranded and rebadged, hidden,
   'anonymous'.
   --- more of this insane ungrounded viewpoint --

   it was mentioned a three variable 'string' [x|y|z] would be differently
   approached if parallel versus serial, in that each bit of a binary
   string could be N-variable in a parallel approach, or so it is assumed
   possible, as with probabilities and slot machines, or basic everyday
   observation of events and what enters and exits consciousness given
   context. and while not knowing the depth of this in terms of
   cryptography, completely out of my depth, it would seem the concept of
   keyspace could relate to how such a 'paradoxical string' could exist,
   given the boundary for determining what N could be for [x], [y], [z].
   For instance if it were binary ones and zeroes, the probabilities could
   be run and 8 different permutations or combinations: 111, 100, 110,
   101, 010, 011, 001, 000.
   And within that, perhaps there is meaning. Yet if 'the probabilities'
   are changed via [N]-bit variables, it could go all the way to infinity
   for a single variable, and thus BIG BANG inflate via probabilities into
   a huge keyspace, perhaps unpacking structures this way that reference
   others already developed, as if infrastructure being revealed that
   connects with others elsewhere, via wormhole-like connectivity and then
   closing down upon successful messaging, thus encrypting and decrypting
   via few variables, via inherent yet hidden structural relations within
   these combinations, which could be infinities related to infinities and
   then the issue of how to find them or what to look for. Black box yet
   even moreso, RNG as model for signal, not noise, thus tending toward
   psychic Random Event Generator as if innate sense of animals before
   catastrophe, cosmic faults and folds.
   the idea or difference is paradox- essentially *superposition* of the
   bit as [N]-variable, no longer finite and static, potentially active
   and transformative, diagnostic even in a sensor sense of the analogue
   as queued circuit. What if alignment occurs in the string under certain
   conditions and not others, what if it tunes in and structures revealed,
   decrypt, yet out of tune it vanishes, code collapse or changes as with
   temperature sensing colors, and the variables change, mask into
   background, returning to mystery. It does not seem that computers today
   can even adequately allow for infinity, a single bit of this, versus a
   larger parallel string- and what might that mean about thinking, too.
   nothing more than finite discreet thoughts, one decision to the next
   unconnected, unless largest prime, say rogue US terror-state pwns earth
   as if master discourse, shared POV, even though ungrounded- this the
   dumbed down unintelligent lowliest shared viewpoint of situations in
   their depth, instead made shallow, sold as daily headline? the CODE
   makes it so, in brains and machinery and bureaucracy. binary is the
   enforced and corrupted 'shared state', conceptually and ideologically,
   yet it is a false belief.
   the issue then of shared and unshared identity, belonging or not
   belonging to this 'master/slave' thinking...
     shared ID <-----> unshared ID
   And how this relates to default interpretations, the quickest route for
   'feedback' and determining events based on perspective... are you
   binary or paradoxical?
   Can you make sense of your own consciousness or must you take on false
   consciousness to function in society and go about decision-making in
   its frameworks, taking on its value systems yet which fragment a person
   from their own 'true' self, taking over and reformatting and
   reprogramming a life to serve the machine agenda over and against
   'shared humanity' -- now an unshared identity, via private relativistic
   ideology. sell out your ancestors and neighbors for a place in the
   machine...
   Quickest route to thinking- *binary* of course, processor speed as if
   SUPERSMART! --- "look- i can decide things and determine things
   irrespective of their actual truth, and it works for me and others,
   everyone else is just lazy!"  Like water flowing downhill, 'logical
   reasoning' turned into Price is Right PLINKO game, quick and easy
   'automated reasoning' via path of least resistance aided and abetted by
   binary ideology, creating friction-free virtual universe, mind detached
   from body by also flawed historical beliefs, enabling this madness its
   onesided platform. the trope of largest prime 'uncorrected ideological
   perspective' the trophy award for the most stupid, greedy, and
   ignorant. an entire society and civilization built around rewarding
   those whose activities align with this, against human conscience and
   its needs, that then is viewed as the enemy.
   --- major social dynamic ---
   ideologically there is a differentiation in terms of the process of
   reasoning, how information is parsed...
      intelligent <-----> smart
   also, how shared identity may differ between empirical and relativistic
   models of truth...
      truth <-----> partial truth
   and the difference in conceptualization, reliance on how frameworks are
   constructed, tested...
      ideas <-----> facts
   and this directly relates to issues of observation and cybernetics
   (looping circuitry)...
      fallible observer  <----->  infallible observer
      error-correction  <----->   no error correction
   In this way 'inflated' or 'bubble' views can rely on warping, skew,
   distortion for their truth which is verified by conforming to a false
   or inaccurate model reliant on a limited *protected* or SECURED version
   of pseudo-truth (pT), as if shared empirical reality (T) removed of
   error, because it is believed to be, via ideology.
     grounded empiricism <-----> ungrounded relativism
   In this way a 'private worldview' can replace 'the public' view as if a
   shared domain, and become the basis for one-sided 'reasoning' depending
   on authoritative beliefs, where facts can be chosen to fit the model,
   others discarded, to uphold the perimeter, basically privatizing
   perspective to a finite inaccurate view as the exploit.
    reality (1) <-----> false-perspective (0)
    humanity <-----> the state (?)
   There is always the possibility that this was planned in advance as a
   cosmic setup from the beginning, and therefore the state could be
   doubled, paradoxical, existing both in the shared truth of humans and
   in the lies of the false viewpoint...
    humanity <----->  state (T|F)
   In this way the two state solution could be moving those 'false' on the
   side of humanity over to the false state, and the true state over to
   side with humanity, via reversal of dynamics, trapping the exploiters
   within their own rigged game...
    human state (1) <-----> rogue state (0)
   And thus doubled or backdoor crypto could be vital to this process,
   itself constituting the trap while transcending this context of
   surveillance and putting it to use for human goals and values,
   working-through this hell into the birth of new cosmic civilization, of
   shared identity, as this relates to eco|soc|pol-issues, shared set
   evaluations for money and taxes and policy and direction slash
   governance, versus the corrupt code and its circuits etched into the
   world and minds today as pain, suffering, terror, horror, insanity.
   // * the following repeated text in case superscript numbers do not
   translate, for reference:
   In other words, instead of XYZ being a serial number that could extend
   linearly onward toward infinity, that is: [xyz] ...[infinity], and that
   "string" is a horizontal number or code, that can in particular be
   related perhaps to binary on-off processing in a highly efficient
   manner, processing and computational speed and largest prime numbers as
   context-- instead, the assumption for this same situation in another
   crypto framework is that it could be happening 'vertically' like a slot
   machine that runs to bounded infinities (largest primes or not), within
   each variable, and thus [xyz] may not have a discernible linear
   structure or overall equation that makes sense of the resulting
   'horizontal' string. such that:
      [x][y][z] => [n^1][n^2][n^3]...[n^n]
   whereby [n] is variable and could be anything- a number, a function, a
   calculation, null, its own computation. And in this way, each variable
   could tend towards infinity or its own structuring, within the string,
   whose length is not so much the issue as the difficulty in resolving
   its total structure, especially linearly, such that [n^123] would not
   be decipherable running algorithms across its horizontal string and
   instead solving for each variable or say grouped variables in the
   string, eg. [n^1][n^2-3][n^4-9]
   ⚔