USA 2020 Elections: Thread

[grarpamp]

You can find links to zipfiles from the laptop drives on the internet,
the war room, gnews, hunter biden laptop archive, etc.

Some hints from Nov 2020...

https://mega.nz/file/bwgDlSDQ#QFR1-JR-cO3F7Jg_qPu0-nI96xO0tAQwfw6nUhYcwa4
https://ia801507.us.archive.org/view_archive.php?archive=/8/items/hb-docs/HB_DOCS.zip&file=Random%20Thoughts%20on%202018%20Business%20Plan.pdf
https://ia801507.us.archive.org/view_archive.php?archive=/8/items/hb-docs/HB_DOCS.zip&file=NAMES%2FIncome.pdf
https://ia601507.us.archive.org/view_archive.php?archive=/8/items/hb-docs/HB_DOCS.zip
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/11/the_hunter_biden_emails_are_now_available_on_the_internet.html


https://www.theepochtimes.com/t-hunter-biden-laptop


Matt Gaetz Enters Hunter Biden Laptop Data Into Congressional Record

https://www.theepochtimes.com/matt-gaetz-enters-hunter-biden-laptop-data-into-congressional-record_4369167.html
https://nypost.com/2022/03/29/gaetz-tries-to-get-hunter-biden-laptop-into-congressional-record/
https://www.newsmax.com/politics/hunter-biden-matt-gaetz-jerry-nadler-laptop/2022/03/29/id/1063455/
https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-matt-gaetz-enters-hunter-bidens-laptop-into-the-congressional-record
https://grabien.com/story.php?id=372561

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/07/cyberhacks_what_does_china_have_on_biden.html

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/10/why_is_joe_biden_buying_drones_from_china.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_UnHvnuv14



Matt Gaetz Enters Hunter Biden Laptop Data Into Congressional Record

Authored by Ken Silva via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

“I seek unanimous consent to enter into the record on this committee
the contents of Hunter Biden’s laptop, which I am in possession of.”
Hunter Biden walks to Marine One on the Ellipse outside the White
House in Washington on May 22, 2021. (Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty
Images)

This request from Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) briefly brought the House
Judiciary Committee to a standstill March 29, before chairman Jerry
Nadler (D-N.Y.) relented and allowed the laptop data to become
congressional record—archiving the business deals, pornographic
images, and illicit data said to be on the infamous hard drive.

Gaetz’s surprise move followed a heated exchange with Bryan Vorndran,
the assistant director of the FBI’s cyber division. The Florida
representative asked numerous questions about the Hunter Biden laptop,
only to have Vorndran profess ignorance to each one.

“In December 2019, they turned over the laptop to the FBI. And now
you’re telling me as FBI’s assistant director of cyber, you don’t know
where this is after it was turned over to you three years ago?” Gaetz
asked.

“Yes sir, that’s an accurate statement,” Vorndran responded.

Gaetz said he found Vorndran’s response shocking. The FBI official
argued that investigations into the laptop are not his responsibility.

Gaetz then asked whether anyone within the FBI’s cyber division has
assessed whether Hunter Biden’s laptop has created a security
vulnerability for the country.

“We can do this back and forth for the next couple of minutes. I don’t
have any information about the Hunter Biden laptop,” Vorndran said.

Gaetz pressed further: “But should you? You’re the assistant director
of the FBI’s cyber division,”

Vorndran said that, according to FBI HR flowcharts, no he should not
have any information. But he also declined to say who within the FBI
would.

Gaetz asked if the FBI would brief Congress on the laptop. Vorndran
said he’d relay the request, but was non-committal as to whether a
briefing will happen.

“Is Congress worthy of such a briefing?” Gaetz asked, referring to
Vorndran as the Chris Webber of the FBI—a reference to a basketball
player who made a mistake that cost his team the NCAA championship.

“So you don’t have it, you don’t know who has it, you don’t know where
it is. Earlier this hearing, you were talking about whether you were
the Grant Hill or Christian Laetner of the FBI,” Gaetz said. “It
sounds like you’re the Chris Webber, trying to call time outs when you
don’t have any.”

Vorndran appeared to be short of temper by the end of the interchange.

“I’m not going to answer that question!” the FBI official said in
response to Gaetz’s repeated requests for a briefing. “The invitation
says, ‘oversight of the FBI’s cyber division.’”

Gaetz then silenced the chamber when he asked to enter the laptop’s
contents into the congressional record. Only murmurs could be heard as
chairman Nadler consulted with a staffer.

“We will object, pending further investigation,” Nadler said.

“What’s the basis for objection?” Gaetz asked.
“It’s a unanimous consent request, and I object,” Nadler responded.
“It may very well be entered into the record after we look into it
further.”

About 10 minutes later, after another representative questioned
Vorndran, Gaetz again motioned to enter the laptop contents into the
record.

“After consultation with majority staff, I seek unanimous consent to
enter into this committee content from, files from, and copies from
Hunter Biden’s laptop,” he said.

This time, no one objected. Gaetz was also allowed to enter the
receipt Hunter Biden allegedly signed at the Mac store.




https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/03/how_does_the_fbi_lose_a_laptop_like_hunter_bidens.html

How does the FBI 'lose' a laptop like Hunter Biden's?
By Monica Showalter

Some things don't make sense.

That brings us to some testimony from the FBI's assistant director for
cyber-security, who told Congress's Rep. Matt Gaetz that he had no
idea where Hunter Biden's laptop, entrusted to FBI custody, actually
is.

According to the Post Millennial:

    "Who has it?" Gaetz asked.

    "I don't know who has it," said [FBI Assistant Director for the
Cyber Division Bryan] Vorndran.

    "What now you're telling me right here is that as the Assistant
Director of FBI Cyber, you don't know where this is, after it was
turned over to you three years ago?" Gaetz said.

    "Yes, sir. That's an accurate statement," Vorndran responded.

    "How are Americans supposed to trust that you can protect us from
the next Colonial pipeline if it seems you can't locate a laptop that
was given to you three years ago from the First Family, potentially
creating vulnerabilities for our country?" Gaetz asked.

    "Sir, it's not in the purview of my investigative
responsibilities," Vorndran said.

    "But that is shocking that you wouldn't, as the Assistant Director
of Cyber, know whether or not there are international business deals,
kickbacks, shakedowns, that are on this laptop that would make the
First Family suspect to some sort of compromise," said Gaetz.

Vorndran should be embarrassed.

The whereabouts of this laptop are something he should know.  Even if
he doesn't have it, he should know who does have it because it's a
computer matter that likely affects his job of protecting the country
from cyber-attacks.

The exchange continues:

    VORNDRAN: "Sir, as a representative of the FBI cyber program, it
is not in the realm of my responsibilities to deal with the questions
that you're asking me."

    GAETZ: "Has anyone at FBI cyber been asked to make assessments
whether or not the laptop creates a point of vulnerability?"

    VORNDRAN: "Sir, we have multiple lines of investigative
responsibility in the FBI. They're all available on public source."

    GAETZ: "I would think you'd know this one. I mean, I would think
that if the President's son, who does international business deals,
referencing the now-president with the Chinese, with Ukrainians, I
mean, have you assessed whether or not the Hunter Biden laptop gives
Russia the ability to harm our country?"

Now, to try to understand how the Bureau man is arguing it, the guy
seemed to be saying he is focused on cyber-attack activity from
foreign countries, and the laptop is a domestic political matter.

There is plenty going on on the foreign attacks front, and I hope he
answered some important questions about Microsoft's charge that China
did a major cyber-attack on its servers a year ago, as well as reports
that Russia is suspected of cyber-attacks on the Colonial pipeline and
America's meat industry.  Russia got sanctioned big on the muddy
information in that incident, which requires clarity about what the
U.S. knows at this point, while China, which clearly was culpable, got
no sanctions whatsoever.  Does that sound funny?  I wrote about that
here.

There's also the issue of Joe Biden buying China's spyware drones for
U.S. national security purposes — which again raises more red flags.
It would be nice to know what Assistant Director Vorndran has to say
about that.

All of these anomalies point to why the Hunter Biden laptop actually
is important to U.S. cyber-security and does affect the job of
protecting the U.S. from foreign cyber-attacks.

Yet Vorndran is amazingly incurious.

The Hunter Biden computer clearly shows the Biden family in sexually,
legally, druggishly, and financially compromising positions, with
significant potential for foreign blackmail.  Given that Joe is
prominently featured in that laptop as using his political influence
as currency for the exchange of cash and political favors, it may well
be that China evaded sanctions because of various financial matters
cited in the contents of that computer.  The same goes for which
Russian oligarchs got sanctioned over Ukraine and which ones didn't.

On the public credibility front, Vorndran does no better.  He told
Gaetz that the laptop was not in his investigative bailiwick, but a
credible question could be raised as to why not.  The
influence-peddling cited in the laptop clearly affects his job, making
it a lot harder to protect the country from cyber-attacks as certain
cyber-attackers evade sanctions and others don't, certain drones get
bought from China's spyware outfits and others don't.

The fact that the computer, or enough of it, is out there in public
and apparently not classified at all might be a factor for the
apparent FBI indifference as to its contents  — Intelligence Community
characters like their information to be entirely secret, and this
stuff isn't secret.

But it doesn't explain Vorndran's ignorance of the computer's
whereabouts.  The FBI was entrusted to protect this device as part of
its duty to protect evidence, and as evidence goes, this is a whopper.
Where the Hunter Biden laptop is is something he should know.  His
claims that he doesn't know suggest sloppy stewardship or ignorance of
Bureau procedures, if not outright lying, which is a distinct
possibility, too.

The fact that he doesn't "know" ultimately suggests that the Bureau
remains a politicized agency, still at the exclusive beck and call of
the Democrat party, as a sort of KGB for Democrats — and may well be
why the U.S. is so ineffective at countering cyber-attacks, which at
last reports are getting bigger and more dangerous than the Colonial
pipeline attack, as AT contributor Julio Rivera wrote here.  Was he
singing for his supper to Joe Biden with this kind of remark?  If so,
that doesn't make the Bureau look good.

Some twitterers have made important observations about this obvious
appearance of politicization:

    Two years later and they don't know where the virus came from, or
where Hunter's laptop is, or where all the billions in COVID stimulus
went, or how many criminal illegal aliens have crossed into the
country, but have no fear, they're going to get to the bottom of
Trump's phone.
    — Rising serpent 🇺🇸 (@rising_serpent) March 29, 2022

    Why does the FBI always “lose”, delete or ignore evidence of
criminal activity committed by the Democrats [or UniParty], and then
make up crimes when none exist to frame their enemies [ie. Russian
Collusion Hoax, Gen Flynn, Kavanaugh, etc.].

    Is that their true purpose?
    — Murray 🇺🇸 (@Rothbard1776) March 30, 2022

    Hunter Biden’s laptop was probably PG compared to whatever was on
Anthony Weiner’s hard drive. Let’s track that one down next.
https://t.co/CJDFVwSLgS
    — Murray 🇺🇸 (@Rothbard1776) March 29, 2022

How anyone could argue with these observations is amazing.  How indeed
does the FBI lose track of something as pivotal as the Hunter Biden
laptop?  And why does it not seem to care?  To Democrats, the press,
and the politicized government agencies, it's all about ignoring the
issue, and keeping corrupt old Joe Biden and his political
influence-peddling machine happy.  Why are they doing that?