hacker != cracker (Re: Swartz, Weev & radical libertarian lexicon)

[Cari Machet]

1st off if someone is indigenous it is not the same as being native
polish > mayb u r ignorant of indigenous information AND if an
indigenous person wants to talk about it 2 times on a list i think
that is interesting not something to censor > i am not interested in
censoring or being censored that is one reason i am interested in
opensource and you would think that if someone is interested in
opensource they would b able to see how that is applicable beyond that
of software and the ramifications therein

otherwise i really dont need a daddy but thanks anyway - i find your
comments incredibly rude and purposefully degrading and quite the
contrary to your last sentence which calls for discussion > i dont
think you are modeling any kind of way to be open to discussing at all

as for your argument re the road i think it would not hold up in court
as the road builder would never be held responsible > so in the US the
state certifies roads afterwords so the state agency in the US anyway
would be liable so...

attacking someones form in an argument is really easy and doesnt show
an expansive form from the attacker it just shows they lack a
formidable argument and hence they loose credibliity and dont engage
ethics which is really sad



On 1/9/14, rysiek <rysiek at hackerspace.pl> wrote:
> Dnia czwartek, 9 stycznia 2014 00:23:50 Cari Machet pisze:
>> ok mayb i was a little over zealous > i am native american prone to
>> being close to life >
>
> Why do you keep bringing your native-americanness in every otehr post is
> beyond me. I'm a native Pole, somebody here is probably a native German,
> what
> does it have to do with anything? Just drop it already.
>
>> so if i build a road and you have a car wreck on it shld i b liable if
>> you kill someone with your car ????
>
> It would also be beneficial to all parties involved if you read the e-mails
>
> you're (supposedly) answering to, and tried to choose analogies
> accordingly.
>
> But answering your question: if there is a demonstrable fault in the way the
>
> road was built -- for example, there is an *outward* slant at a turn on a
> highway/motorway -- then I would say "to some extent, yes". To what extent?
>
> That's for the jury to decide, but if the fault contributed to the tragedy,
>
> the builder of the road is (partially) responsible.
>
> By the way, I would greatly appreciate you making the effort to respect the
>
> by-laws of the (let's call that) Internet-natives of this list, and using
> English instead of the t33nz lulzspk tht u seem 2 b usng, kthx. If you want
> to
> encrypt your messages, use PGP instead of lulzspeak, it will work much
> better.
>
>> plus it opens the door for other opensource 'heretical' laws to be
>> promulgated on the citizenry for its 'protection'
>
> That's my problem with this idea, that's why I am floating it and asking for
> a
> discussion. Maybe there is a way to do it properly?
>
> --
> Pozdr
> rysiek


-- 
Cari Machet
NYC 646-436-7795
carimachet at gmail.com
AIM carismachet
Syria +963-099 277 3243
Amman +962 077 636 9407
Berlin +49 152 11779219
Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet>

Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the
addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without
permission is strictly prohibited.